Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 2041


Age-specific evaluation of primary human papillomavirus screening vs conventional cytology in a randomized setting.

Leinonen M, Nieminen P, Kotaniemi-Talonen L, Malila N, Tarkkanen J, Laurila P, Anttila A.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 Dec 2;101(23):1612-23. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp367. Epub 2009 Nov 9.


Results at recruitment from a randomized controlled trial comparing human papillomavirus testing alone with conventional cytology as the primary cervical cancer screening test.

Ronco G, Giorgi-Rossi P, Carozzi F, Confortini M, Dalla Palma P, Del Mistro A, Gillio-Tos A, Minucci D, Naldoni C, Rizzolo R, Schincaglia P, Volante R, Zappa M, Zorzi M, Cuzick J, Segnan N; New Technologies for Cervical Cancer Screening Working Group.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Apr 2;100(7):492-501. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn065. Epub 2008 Mar 25.


Human papillomavirus testing and liquid-based cytology: results at recruitment from the new technologies for cervical cancer randomized controlled trial.

Ronco G, Segnan N, Giorgi-Rossi P, Zappa M, Casadei GP, Carozzi F, Dalla Palma P, Del Mistro A, Folicaldi S, Gillio-Tos A, Nardo G, Naldoni C, Schincaglia P, Zorzi M, Confortini M, Cuzick J; New Technologies for Cervical Cancer Working Group.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006 Jun 7;98(11):765-74.


Efficacy of HPV DNA testing with cytology triage and/or repeat HPV DNA testing in primary cervical cancer screening.

Naucler P, Ryd W, Törnberg S, Strand A, Wadell G, Elfgren K, Rådberg T, Strander B, Forslund O, Hansson BG, Hagmar B, Johansson B, Rylander E, Dillner J.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 Jan 21;101(2):88-99. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn444. Epub 2009 Jan 13.


Re: Age-specific evaluation of primary human papillomavirus screening vs conventional cytology in a randomized setting.

Lynge E, Rebolj M.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 May 19;102(10):739; author reply 739-40. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq109. Epub 2010 Apr 1. No abstract available.


Test positivity cutoff level of a high risk human papillomavirus test could be increased in routine cervical cancer screening.

Kotaniemi-Talonen L, Malila N, Nieminen P, Anttila A, Tarkkanen J, Laurila P, Hakama M.

Int J Cancer. 2008 Dec 15;123(12):2902-6. doi: 10.1002/ijc.23839.


[Health technology assessment report: HPV DNA based primary screening for cervical cancer precursors].

Ronco G, Biggeri A, Confortini M, Naldoni C, Segnan N, Sideri M, Zappa M, Zorzi M, Calvia M, Accetta G, Giordano L, Cogo C, Carozzi F, Gillio Tos A, Arbyn M, Mejier CJ, Snijders PJ, Cuzick J, Giorgi Rossi P.

Epidemiol Prev. 2012 May-Aug;36(3-4 Suppl 1):e1-72. Italian.


Performance of carcinogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) testing and HPV16 or HPV18 genotyping for cervical cancer screening of women aged 25 years and older: a subanalysis of the ATHENA study.

Castle PE, Stoler MH, Wright TC Jr, Sharma A, Wright TL, Behrens CM.

Lancet Oncol. 2011 Sep;12(9):880-90. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70188-7. Epub 2011 Aug 22.


Evaluation of human papillomavirus testing in primary screening for cervical abnormalities: comparison of sensitivity, specificity, and frequency of referral.

Kulasingam SL, Hughes JP, Kiviat NB, Mao C, Weiss NS, Kuypers JM, Koutsky LA.

JAMA. 2002 Oct 9;288(14):1749-57.


Risk-adapted primary HPV cervical cancer screening project in Wolfsburg, Germany--experience over 3 years.

Luyten A, Scherbring S, Reinecke-Lüthge A, Braun BE, Pietralla M, Theiler K, Petry KU.

J Clin Virol. 2009 Nov;46 Suppl 3:S5-10. doi: 10.1016/S1386-6532(09)70294-X.


[Combining high-risk human papillomavirus DNA test and cytological test to detect early cervical dysplasia].

Qian DY, Cen JM, Wang D, Zeng RH, Lin AH, Shu YH, Hong DH, Huang ZH.

Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2006 Jan;41(1):34-7. Chinese.


Determination of the diagnostic accuracy of testing for high-risk (HR) human papillomavirus (HPV) types 16, 18 and 45 in precancerous cervical lesions: preliminary data.

Tiews S, Steinberg W, Schneider W, Hanrath C.

J Clin Virol. 2009 Nov;46 Suppl 3:S11-5. doi: 10.1016/S1386-6532(09)70295-1.


Detection rates of precancerous and cancerous cervical lesions within one screening round of primary human papillomavirus DNA testing: prospective randomised trial in Finland.

Leinonen MK, Nieminen P, Lönnberg S, Malila N, Hakama M, Pokhrel A, Laurila P, Tarkkanen J, Anttila A.

BMJ. 2012 Nov 29;345:e7789. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e7789.


Virologic versus cytologic triage of women with equivocal Pap smears: a meta-analysis of the accuracy to detect high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia.

Arbyn M, Buntinx F, Van Ranst M, Paraskevaidis E, Martin-Hirsch P, Dillner J.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 Feb 18;96(4):280-93.


Human papillomavirus testing for the detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cancer: final results of the POBASCAM randomised controlled trial.

Rijkaart DC, Berkhof J, Rozendaal L, van Kemenade FJ, Bulkmans NW, Heideman DA, Kenter GG, Cuzick J, Snijders PJ, Meijer CJ.

Lancet Oncol. 2012 Jan;13(1):78-88. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70296-0. Epub 2011 Dec 14.


Human papillomavirus testing versus repeat cytology for triage of minor cytological cervical lesions.

Arbyn M, Roelens J, Simoens C, Buntinx F, Paraskevaidis E, Martin-Hirsch PP, Prendiville WJ.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Mar 28;3:CD008054. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008054.pub2. Review.


Screening for high-grade cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia and cancer by testing for high-risk HPV, routine cytology or colposcopy.

Schneider A, Hoyer H, Lotz B, Leistritza S, Kühne-Heid R, Nindl I, Müller B, Haerting J, Dürst M.

Int J Cancer. 2000 Nov 20;89(6):529-34.


High-risk HPV DNA detection by Hybrid Capture II. An adjunctive test for mildly abnormal cytologic smears in women > or = 50 years of age.

Lin CT, Tseng CJ, Lai CH, Hsueh S, Huang HJ, Law KS.

J Reprod Med. 2000 Apr;45(4):345-50.


Contribution of human papillomavirus testing by hybrid capture in the triage of women with repeated abnormal pap smears before colposcopy referral.

Fait G, Kupferminc MJ, Daniel Y, Geva E, Ron IG, Lessing JB, Bar-Am A.

Gynecol Oncol. 2000 Nov;79(2):177-80.

Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk