Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 119

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 19754525)

1.

Arbitrary social norms influence sex differences in romantic selectivity.

Finkel EJ, Eastwick PW.

Psychol Sci. 2009 Oct;20(10):1290-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02439.x. Epub 2009 Sep 14.

PMID:
19754525
2.

Romantic interest in obese college students.

Aruguete MS, Edman JL, Yates A.

Eat Behav. 2009 Aug;10(3):143-5. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2009.03.004. Epub 2009 Mar 29.

PMID:
19665095
3.
4.
5.

Sex differences in mate preferences revisited: do people know what they initially desire in a romantic partner?

Eastwick PW, Finkel EJ.

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Feb;94(2):245-64. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.94.2.245.

PMID:
18211175
6.

Implicit and explicit preferences for physical attractiveness in a romantic partner: a double dissociation in predictive validity.

Eastwick PW, Eagly AH, Finkel EJ, Johnson SE.

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Nov;101(5):993-1011. doi: 10.1037/a0024061.

PMID:
21767032
7.

What leads to romantic attraction: similarity, reciprocity, security, or beauty? Evidence from a speed-dating study.

Luo S, Zhang G.

J Pers. 2009 Aug;77(4):933-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00570.x. Epub 2009 May 18.

PMID:
19558447
8.
10.
11.

Partner preferences across the life span: online dating by older adults.

Alterovitz SS, Mendelsohn GA.

Psychol Aging. 2009 Jun;24(2):513-7. doi: 10.1037/a0015897.

PMID:
19485668
12.

Effects of solicitor sex and attractiveness on receptivity to sexual offers: a field study.

Gu├ęguen N.

Arch Sex Behav. 2011 Oct;40(5):915-9. doi: 10.1007/s10508-011-9750-4. Epub 2011 Mar 3.

PMID:
21369773
13.

So far away from one's partner, yet so close to romantic alternatives: avoidant attachment, interest in alternatives, and infidelity.

Dewall CN, Lambert NM, Slotter EB, Pond RS, Deckman T, Finkel EJ, Luchies LB, Fincham FD.

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Dec;101(6):1302-16. doi: 10.1037/a0025497. Epub 2011 Oct 3.

PMID:
21967006
14.

Gender, race, class and self-reported sexually transmitted disease incidence.

Tanfer K, Cubbins LA, Billy JO.

Fam Plann Perspect. 1995 Sep-Oct;27(5):196-202.

15.

Red, rank, and romance in women viewing men.

Elliot AJ, Kayser DN, Greitemeyer T, Lichtenfeld S, Gramzow RH, Maier MA, Liu H.

J Exp Psychol Gen. 2010 Aug;139(3):399-417. doi: 10.1037/a0019689.

PMID:
20677892
16.
17.

Heterosexual experiences and partnerships of urban, low-income African-American and Hispanic youth.

Norris AE, Ford K, Shyr Y, Schork MA.

J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol. 1996 Mar 1;11(3):288-300.

PMID:
8603265
18.

An evolutionary perspective on humor: sexual selection or interest indication?

Li NP, Griskevicius V, Durante KM, Jonason PK, Pasisz DJ, Aumer K.

Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2009 Jul;35(7):923-36. doi: 10.1177/0146167209334786. Epub 2009 Apr 30.

PMID:
19407005
19.

Romantic red: red enhances men's attraction to women.

Elliot AJ, Niesta D.

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Nov;95(5):1150-64. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.95.5.1150.

PMID:
18954199
20.

Body image satisfaction in heterosexual, gay, and lesbian adults.

Peplau LA, Frederick DA, Yee C, Maisel N, Lever J, Ghavami N.

Arch Sex Behav. 2009 Oct;38(5):713-25. doi: 10.1007/s10508-008-9378-1. Epub 2008 Aug 19.

PMID:
18712469
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk