Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 310

1.

2009 updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Back Review Group.

Furlan AD, Pennick V, Bombardier C, van Tulder M; Editorial Board, Cochrane Back Review Group.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Aug 15;34(18):1929-41. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b1c99f.

PMID:
19680101
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
2.

Updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the cochrane collaboration back review group.

van Tulder M, Furlan A, Bombardier C, Bouter L; Editorial Board of the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Jun 15;28(12):1290-9.

PMID:
12811274
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
3.

EJPRM systematic continuous update on Cochrane reviews in rehabilitation: news from the 4th Issue 2008.

Zaina F.

Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2009 Mar;45(1):93-101.

PMID:
19293757
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
4.

The sensitivity of review results to methods used to appraise and incorporate trial quality into data synthesis.

van der Velde G, van Tulder M, Côté P, Hogg-Johnson S, Aker P, Cassidy JD; Scientific Secretariat of The Bone and Joint Decade 2000-2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders, Carragee E, Carroll L, Guzman J, Haldeman S, Holm L, Hurwitz E, Nordin M, Peloso P.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Apr 1;32(7):796-806. Review.

PMID:
17414916
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
5.

[Bibliometric analysis of systematic reviews in the Neonatal Cochrane Collaboration. Its role in evidence-based decision making in neonatology].

González de Dios J.

An Pediatr (Barc). 2004 May;60(5):417-27. Spanish.

PMID:
15104996
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
6.

Cochrane reviews used more rigorous methods than non-Cochrane reviews: survey of systematic reviews in physiotherapy.

Moseley AM, Elkins MR, Herbert RD, Maher CG, Sherrington C.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Oct;62(10):1021-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.09.018. Epub 2009 Mar 17. Review.

PMID:
19282144
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
7.

The use of systematic reviews when designing studies.

Cooper NJ, Jones DR, Sutton AJ.

Clin Trials. 2005;2(3):260-4.

PMID:
16279149
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
8.

Muscle relaxants for nonspecific low back pain: a systematic review within the framework of the cochrane collaboration.

van Tulder MW, Touray T, Furlan AD, Solway S, Bouter LM; Cochrane Back Review Group.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Sep 1;28(17):1978-92. Review.

PMID:
12973146
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
9.

Inconsistent grading of evidence across countries: a review of low back pain guidelines.

Murphy AY, van Teijlingen ER, Gobbi MO.

J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2006 Sep;29(7):576-81, 581.e1-2. Review.

PMID:
16949948
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
10.

Method guidelines for Cochrane Musculoskeletal Group systematic reviews.

Maxwell L, Santesso N, Tugwell PS, Wells GA, Judd M, Buchbinder R.

J Rheumatol. 2006 Nov;33(11):2304-11.

PMID:
17086611
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
11.

Methodology and reports of systematic reviews and meta-analyses: a comparison of Cochrane reviews with articles published in paper-based journals.

Jadad AR, Cook DJ, Jones A, Klassen TP, Tugwell P, Moher M, Moher D.

JAMA. 1998 Jul 15;280(3):278-80.

PMID:
9676681
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
12.

Back schools for nonspecific low back pain: a systematic review within the framework of the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group.

Heymans MW, van Tulder MW, Esmail R, Bombardier C, Koes BW.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Oct 1;30(19):2153-63. Review.

PMID:
16205340
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
13.

Investing in updating: how do conclusions change when Cochrane systematic reviews are updated?

French SD, McDonald S, McKenzie JE, Green SE.

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005 Oct 14;5:33.

PMID:
16225692
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
14.

Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.

Manchikanti L, Datta S, Smith HS, Hirsch JA.

Pain Physician. 2009 Sep-Oct;12(5):819-50.

PMID:
19787009
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
15.

EJPRM systematic continuous update on Cochrane reviews in rehabilitation: news from the 3rd Issue 2009.

Zaina F, Negrini S.

Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2009 Dec;45(4):605-19. Review.

PMID:
20032920
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
16.

Converting systematic reviews to Cochrane format: a cross-sectional survey of Australian authors of systematic reviews.

Piehl JH, Green S, McDonald S.

BMC Health Serv Res. 2003 Jan 17;3(1):2.

PMID:
12533194
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
17.

[Volume and health outcomes: an overview of systematic reviews].

Davoli M, Amato L, Minozzi S, Bargagli AM, Vecchi S, Perucci CA.

Epidemiol Prev. 2005 May-Aug;29(3-4 Suppl):3-63. Italian.

PMID:
16529350
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
18.

Evidence in dentistry guidelines.

Macedo CR, Atallah AN.

Sao Paulo Med J. 2009 Nov;127(6):346-9.

PMID:
20512288
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
19.

An analysis of systematic reviews indicated low incorpororation of results from clinical trial quality assessment.

de Craen AJ, van Vliet HA, Helmerhorst FM.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 Mar;58(3):311-3.

PMID:
15718121
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
20.

The science of systematic reviewing studies of diagnostic tests.

Oosterhuis WP, Niessen RW, Bossuyt PM.

Clin Chem Lab Med. 2000 Jul;38(7):577-88. Review.

PMID:
11028761
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk