Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 122

1.

Reducing between scanner differences in multi-center PET studies.

Joshi A, Koeppe RA, Fessler JA.

Neuroimage. 2009 May 15;46(1):154-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.01.057. Epub 2009 Feb 6.

PMID:
19457369
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
2.

Quantification of FDG PET studies using standardised uptake values in multi-centre trials: effects of image reconstruction, resolution and ROI definition parameters.

Westerterp M, Pruim J, Oyen W, Hoekstra O, Paans A, Visser E, van Lanschot J, Sloof G, Boellaard R.

Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2007 Mar;34(3):392-404. Epub 2006 Oct 11.

PMID:
17033848
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
3.

Atlas-guided non-uniform attenuation correction in cerebral 3D PET imaging.

Montandon ML, Zaidi H.

Neuroimage. 2005 Mar;25(1):278-86. Epub 2005 Jan 17.

PMID:
15734362
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
4.

Brain FDG PET study of normal aging in Japanese: effect of atrophy correction.

Yanase D, Matsunari I, Yajima K, Chen W, Fujikawa A, Nishimura S, Matsuda H, Yamada M.

Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2005 Jul;32(7):794-805. Epub 2005 Mar 10.

PMID:
15759148
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
5.

Rapid scanning protocol for brain (18)F-FDG PET: a validation study.

Chen WP, Matsunari I, Noda A, Yanase D, Yajima K, Takeda N, Yamada M, Minoshima S, Nishimura S.

J Nucl Med. 2005 Oct;46(10):1633-41.

PMID:
16204713
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
6.

[Multi-center study of inter-scanner difference in brain positron emission tomography].

Oda K, Sakata M, Nishio T, Tsushima H, Tanizaki Y, Kato S, Ochi S.

Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi. 2012;68(6):669-79. Japanese.

PMID:
22805443
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
7.

Usefulness of noise adaptive non-linear gaussian filter in FDG-PET study.

Nagayoshi M, Murase K, Fujino K, Uenishi Y, Kawamata M, Nakamura Y, Kitamura K, Higuchi I, Oku N, Hatazawa J.

Ann Nucl Med. 2005 Sep;19(6):469-77.

PMID:
16248383
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
8.

Limitations of small animal PET imaging with [18F]FDDNP and FDG for quantitative studies in a transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer's disease.

Kuntner C, Kesner AL, Bauer M, Kremslehner R, Wanek T, Mandler M, Karch R, Stanek J, Wolf T, Müller M, Langer O.

Mol Imaging Biol. 2009 Jul-Aug;11(4):236-40. doi: 10.1007/s11307-009-0198-z. Epub 2009 Feb 13.

PMID:
19214638
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
9.

Phantom validation of coregistration of PET and CT for image-guided radiotherapy.

Lavely WC, Scarfone C, Cevikalp H, Li R, Byrne DW, Cmelak AJ, Dawant B, Price RR, Hallahan DE, Fitzpatrick JM.

Med Phys. 2004 May;31(5):1083-92.

PMID:
15191296
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
10.

Evaluation of a new expert system for fully automated detection of the Alzheimer's dementia pattern in FDG PET.

von Borczyskowski D, Wilke F, Martin B, Brenner W, Clausen M, Mester J, Buchert R.

Nucl Med Commun. 2006 Sep;27(9):739-43.

PMID:
16894329
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
11.

Fully automatic diagnostic system for early- and late-onset mild Alzheimer's disease using FDG PET and 3D-SSP.

Ishii K, Kono AK, Sasaki H, Miyamoto N, Fukuda T, Sakamoto S, Mori E.

Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2006 May;33(5):575-83. Epub 2006 Feb 10.

PMID:
16470370
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
12.

Robustness of multivariate image analysis assessed by resampling techniques and applied to FDG-PET scans of patients with Alzheimer's disease.

Markiewicz PJ, Matthews JC, Declerck J, Herholz K.

Neuroimage. 2009 Jun;46(2):472-85.

PMID:
19385015
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
13.

Super-resolution in PET imaging.

Kennedy JA, Israel O, Frenkel A, Bar-Shalom R, Azhari H.

IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2006 Feb;25(2):137-47.

PMID:
16468448
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
14.

Whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT in the presence of truncation artifacts.

Beyer T, Bockisch A, Kühl H, Martinez MJ.

J Nucl Med. 2006 Jan;47(1):91-9.

PMID:
16391192
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
15.

Clinical implications of different image reconstruction parameters for interpretation of whole-body PET studies in cancer patients.

Schöder H, Erdi YE, Chao K, Gonen M, Larson SM, Yeung HW.

J Nucl Med. 2004 Apr;45(4):559-66.

PMID:
15073250
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
16.

Assessment of errors caused by X-ray scatter and use of contrast medium when using CT-based attenuation correction in PET.

Ay MR, Zaidi H.

Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2006 Nov;33(11):1301-13. Epub 2006 Apr 19.

PMID:
16622710
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
17.

An analytical scatter correction for singles-mode transmission data in PET.

Vandervoort E, Sossi V.

IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2008 Mar;27(3):402-12. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2007.909851.

PMID:
18334435
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
18.

The Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative positron emission tomography core.

Jagust WJ, Bandy D, Chen K, Foster NL, Landau SM, Mathis CA, Price JC, Reiman EM, Skovronsky D, Koeppe RA; Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative.

Alzheimers Dement. 2010 May;6(3):221-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2010.03.003.

PMID:
20451870
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
19.

SUV correction for injection errors in FDG-PET examination.

Miyashita K, Takahashi N, Oka T, Asakawa S, Lee J, Shizukuishi K, Inoue T.

Ann Nucl Med. 2007 Dec;21(10):607-13. Epub 2007 Dec 25.

PMID:
18092139
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
20.

Assessment of the impact of model-based scatter correction on [18F]-FDG 3D brain PET in healthy subjects using statistical parametric mapping.

Montandon ML, Slosman DO, Zaidi H.

Neuroimage. 2003 Nov;20(3):1848-56.

PMID:
14642494
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk