Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 417

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 19167049)

1.

Comparison of D&C and office endometrial biopsy accuracy in patients with FIGO grade 1 endometrial adenocarcinoma.

Leitao MM Jr, Kehoe S, Barakat RR, Alektiar K, Gattoc LP, Rabbitt C, Chi DS, Soslow RA, Abu-Rustum NR.

Gynecol Oncol. 2009 Apr;113(1):105-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.12.017. Epub 2009 Jan 23.

PMID:
19167049
2.

Accuracy of preoperative endometrial sampling diagnosis of FIGO grade 1 endometrial adenocarcinoma.

Leitao MM Jr, Kehoe S, Barakat RR, Alektiar K, Gattoc LP, Rabbitt C, Chi DS, Soslow RA, Abu-Rustum NR.

Gynecol Oncol. 2008 Nov;111(2):244-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.07.033. Epub 2008 Aug 27.

PMID:
18752842
3.

Endometrial sampling diagnosis of FIGO grade 1 endometrial adenocarcinoma with a background of complex atypical hyperplasia and final hysterectomy pathology.

Leitao MM Jr, Kehoe S, Barakat RR, Alektiar K, Rabbitt C, Chi DS, Soslow RA, Abu-Rustum NR.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Mar;202(3):278.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.10.882. Epub 2009 Dec 22.

PMID:
20022581
4.

Comparison of D&C and office endometrial biopsy in predicting final histopathologic grade in endometrial cancer.

Larson DM, Johnson KK, Broste SK, Krawisz BR, Kresl JJ.

Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Jul;86(1):38-42.

PMID:
7784020
5.

Concordance of FIGO grade of endometrial adenocarcinomas in biopsy and hysterectomy specimens.

Mitchard J, Hirschowitz L.

Histopathology. 2003 Apr;42(4):372-8.

PMID:
12653949
6.

Complex atypical endometrial hyperplasia: the risk of unrecognized adenocarcinoma and value of preoperative dilation and curettage.

Suh-Burgmann E, Hung YY, Armstrong MA.

Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Sep;114(3):523-9. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181b190d5.

PMID:
19701030
7.

Prediction of cervical infiltration in Stage II endometrial cancer by different preoperative evaluation techniques (D&C, US, CT, MRI).

Pete I, Godény M, Tóth E, Radó J, Pete B, Pulay T.

Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2003;24(6):517-22.

PMID:
14658593
8.

Comparison of D&C and hysterectomy pathologic findings in endometrial cancer patients.

Wang X, Huang Z, Di W, Lin Q.

Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2005 Jul;272(2):136-41. Epub 2005 Jan 22.

PMID:
15666177
9.

Accuracy of preoperative curettage in determining tumor type and grade in endometrial cancer.

Thanachaiviwat A, Thirapakawong C, Leelaphatanadit C, Chuangsuwanich T.

J Med Assoc Thai. 2011 Jul;94(7):766-71.

PMID:
21774280
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.

Comparison between clinical and surgical staging for endometrial cancer in Thailand.

Buranawattanachoke S, Leelahakorn S, Tangjitgamol S, Manusirivithaya S, Khunnarong J.

Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2009 Oct-Dec;10(4):685-90.

16.

Pipelle endometrial sampling in patients with known endometrial carcinoma.

Stovall TG, Photopulos GJ, Poston WM, Ling FW, Sandles LG.

Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Jun;77(6):954-6.

PMID:
2030877
17.

Comparison of the Z-sampler and Novak endometrial biopsy instruments for in-office diagnosis of endometrial cancer.

Larson DM, Krawisz BR, Johnson KK, Broste SK.

Gynecol Oncol. 1994 Jul;54(1):64-7.

PMID:
8020841
18.

Surgical staging for patients presenting with grade 1 endometrial carcinoma.

Ben-Shachar I, Pavelka J, Cohn DE, Copeland LJ, Ramirez N, Manolitsas T, Fowler JM.

Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Mar;105(3):487-93.

PMID:
15738013
19.
20.

Preoperative and intraoperative assessments of depth of myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer.

Sato S, Itamochi H, Shimada M, Fujii S, Naniwa J, Uegaki K, Sato S, Nonaka M, Ogawa T, Kigawa J.

Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2009 Jul;19(5):884-7. doi: 10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181a7a2d9.

PMID:
19574778
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk