Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 370

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 19162440)

1.

An international survey indicated that unpublished systematic reviews exist.

Tricco AC, Pham B, Brehaut J, Tetroe J, Cappelli M, Hopewell S, Lavis JN, Berlin JA, Moher D.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Jun;62(6):617-623.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.09.014. Epub 2009 Jan 21.

PMID:
19162440
2.

Few systematic reviews exist documenting the extent of bias: a systematic review.

Tricco AC, Tetzlaff J, Sampson M, Fergusson D, Cogo E, Horsley T, Moher D.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 May;61(5):422-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.10.017. Review.

PMID:
18394534
3.

Searching for unpublished trials in Cochrane reviews may not be worth the effort.

van Driel ML, De Sutter A, De Maeseneer J, Christiaens T.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Aug;62(8):838-844.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.09.010. Epub 2009 Jan 6.

PMID:
19128939
4.

[Increased number of systematic reviews in the Netherlands in the period 1991-2000].

Grootens KP, Assendelft WJ, Overbeke AJ.

Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2003 Nov 8;147(45):2226-30. Dutch.

PMID:
14640061
5.

An e-mail survey identified unpublished studies for systematic reviews.

Reveiz L, Cardona AF, Ospina EG, de Agular S.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Jul;59(7):755-8.

PMID:
16765280
6.

Evaluation of the usefulness of Internet searches to identify unpublished clinical trials for systematic reviews.

Eysenbach G, Tuische J, Diepgen TL.

Med Inform Internet Med. 2001 Jul-Sep;26(3):203-18.

PMID:
11706930
7.

Review articles and publication bias.

Kleijnen J, Knipschild P.

Arzneimittelforschung. 1992 May;42(5):587-91.

PMID:
1388359
8.

Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews.

Moher D, Tetzlaff J, Tricco AC, Sampson M, Altman DG.

PLoS Med. 2007 Mar 27;4(3):e78.

9.

Updating systematic reviews: an international survey.

Garritty C, Tsertsvadze A, Tricco AC, Sampson M, Moher D.

PLoS One. 2010 Apr 1;5(4):e9914. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009914.

10.

Systematic reviews can be produced and published faster.

Sampson M, Shojania KG, Garritty C, Horsley T, Ocampo M, Moher D.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Jun;61(6):531-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.02.004.

PMID:
18471656
11.

Systematic reviewers commonly contact study authors but do so with limited rigor.

Mullan RJ, Flynn DN, Carlberg B, Tleyjeh IM, Kamath CC, LaBella ML, Erwin PJ, Guyatt GH, Montori VM.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Feb;62(2):138-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.08.002. Epub 2008 Nov 14. Review.

PMID:
19013767
12.

The role of imaging specialists as authors of systematic reviews on diagnostic and interventional imaging and its impact on scientific quality: report from the EuroAIM Evidence-based Radiology Working Group.

Sardanelli F, Bashir H, Berzaczy D, Cannella G, Espeland A, Flor N, Helbich T, Hunink M, Malone DE, Mann R, Muzzupappa C, Petersen LJ, Riklund K, Sconfienza LM, Serafin Z, Spronk S, Stoker J, van Beek EJ, Vorwerk D, Leo GD.

Radiology. 2014 Aug;272(2):533-40. doi: 10.1148/radiol.14131730. Epub 2014 Apr 14.

PMID:
24738613
13.

Frequency and determinants of nonpublication of research in the stroke literature.

Sanossian N, Ohanian AG, Saver JL, Kim LI, Ovbiagele B.

Stroke. 2006 Oct;37(10):2588-92. Epub 2006 Aug 24.

14.

Non-Cochrane vs. Cochrane reviews were twice as likely to have positive conclusion statements: cross-sectional study.

Tricco AC, Tetzlaff J, Pham B, Brehaut J, Moher D.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Apr;62(4):380-386.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.08.008. Epub 2009 Jan 6.

PMID:
19128940
15.

Following 411 Cochrane protocols to completion: a retrospective cohort study.

Tricco AC, Brehaut J, Chen MH, Moher D.

PLoS One. 2008;3(11):e3684. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003684. Epub 2008 Nov 10.

16.

Poor reporting of search strategy and conflict of interest in over 250 narrative and systematic reviews of two biologic agents in arthritis: a systematic review.

Roundtree AK, Kallen MA, Lopez-Olivo MA, Kimmel B, Skidmore B, Ortiz Z, Cox V, Suarez-Almazor ME.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Feb;62(2):128-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.08.003. Epub 2008 Nov 14. Review.

PMID:
19013763
17.

A systematic review identified few methods and strategies describing when and how to update systematic reviews.

Moher D, Tsertsvadze A, Tricco AC, Eccles M, Grimshaw J, Sampson M, Barrowman N.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Nov;60(11):1095-1104. Epub 2007 Aug 3. Review.

PMID:
17938050
18.

Survey of systematic review authors in dentistry: challenges in methodology and reporting.

Major MP, Warren S, Flores-Mir C.

J Dent Educ. 2009 Apr;73(4):471-82.

19.

How to systematically review the medical literature.

Rosenfeld RM.

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1996 Jul;115(1):53-63.

PMID:
8758631
20.

Publication bias and clinical trials.

Dickersin K, Chan S, Chalmers TC, Sacks HS, Smith H Jr.

Control Clin Trials. 1987 Dec;8(4):343-53.

PMID:
3442991
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk