Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 147

1.

Bias in trials comparing paired continuous tests can cause researchers to choose the wrong screening modality.

Glueck DH, Lamb MM, O'Donnell CI, Ringham BM, Brinton JT, Muller KE, Lewin JM, Alonzo TA, Pisano ED.

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009 Jan 20;9:4. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-9-4.

PMID:
19154609
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
2.

Comparing correlated areas under the ROC curves of two diagnostic tests in the presence of verification bias.

Zhou XH.

Biometrics. 1998 Jun;54(2):453-70.

PMID:
9629639
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
3.

Reducing decision errors in the paired comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of screening tests with Gaussian outcomes.

Ringham BM, Alonzo TA, Brinton JT, Kreidler SM, Munjal A, Muller KE, Glueck DH.

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Mar 5;14:37. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-37.

PMID:
24597517
[PubMed - in process]
Free PMC Article
4.

COMPROC and CHECKNORM: computer programs for comparing accuracies of diagnostic tests using ROC curves in the presence of verification bias.

Zhou XH, Higgs RE.

Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 1998 Nov;57(3):179-86.

PMID:
9822855
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
5.

Bias in estimating accuracy of a binary screening test with differential disease verification.

Alonzo TA, Brinton JT, Ringham BM, Glueck DH.

Stat Med. 2011 Jul 10;30(15):1852-64. doi: 10.1002/sim.4232. Epub 2011 Apr 15.

PMID:
21495059
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
6.

Estimates of sensitivity and specificity can be biased when reporting the results of the second test in a screening trial conducted in series.

Ringham BM, Alonzo TA, Grunwald GK, Glueck DH.

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010 Jan 11;10:3. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-3.

PMID:
20064254
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
7.

Direct estimation of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve in the presence of verification bias.

He H, Lyness JM, McDermott MP.

Stat Med. 2009 Feb 1;28(3):361-76. doi: 10.1002/sim.3388.

PMID:
18680124
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
8.

ROC curve estimation when covariates affect the verification process.

Rodenberg C, Zhou XH.

Biometrics. 2000 Dec;56(4):1256-62.

PMID:
11129488
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
9.

ROC curves and the areas under them for dichotomized tests: empirical findings for logistically and normally distributed diagnostic test results.

van der Schouw YT, Straatman H, Verbeek AL.

Med Decis Making. 1994 Oct-Dec;14(4):374-81.

PMID:
7808212
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
10.

Estimation of the ROC curve under verification bias.

Fluss R, Reiser B, Faraggi D, Rotnitzky A.

Biom J. 2009 Jun;51(3):475-90. doi: 10.1002/bimj.200800128.

PMID:
19588455
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
11.

Covariate adjustment in estimating the area under ROC curve with partially missing gold standard.

Liu D, Zhou XH.

Biometrics. 2013 Mar;69(1):91-100. doi: 10.1111/biom.12001. Epub 2013 Feb 14.

PMID:
23410529
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
12.

A new method to address verification bias in studies of clinical screening tests: cervical cancer screening assays as an example.

Xue X, Kim MY, Castle PE, Strickler HD.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Mar;67(3):343-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.09.013. Epub 2013 Dec 12.

PMID:
24332397
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
13.

Avoiding verification bias in screening test evaluation in resource poor settings: a case study from Zimbabwe.

Gaffikin L, McGrath J, Arbyn M, Blumenthal PD.

Clin Trials. 2008;5(5):496-503. doi: 10.1177/1740774508096139.

PMID:
18827042
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
14.

Use of likelihood ratios for comparisons of binary diagnostic tests: underlying ROC curves.

Bandos SI, Rockette HE, Gur D.

Med Phys. 2010 Nov;37(11):5821-30.

PMID:
21158294
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
15.

A Bayesian approach to simultaneously adjusting for verification and reference standard bias in diagnostic test studies.

Lu Y, Dendukuri N, Schiller I, Joseph L.

Stat Med. 2010 Oct 30;29(24):2532-43. doi: 10.1002/sim.4018.

PMID:
20799249
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
16.

Nonparametric estimation of ROC curves in the absence of a gold standard.

Zhou XH, Castelluccio P, Zhou C.

Biometrics. 2005 Jun;61(2):600-9.

PMID:
16011710
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
17.

Semiparametric estimation of the covariate-specific ROC curve in presence of ignorable verification bias.

Liu D, Zhou XH.

Biometrics. 2011 Sep;67(3):906-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2011.01562.x. Epub 2011 Mar 1.

PMID:
21361890
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
18.

Estimating and comparing diagnostic tests' accuracy when the gold standard is not binary.

Obuchowski NA.

Acad Radiol. 2005 Sep;12(9):1198-204.

PMID:
16099683
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
19.

Interval estimation for the difference in paired areas under the ROC curves in the absence of a gold standard test.

Hsieh HN, Su HY, Zhou XH.

Stat Med. 2009 Nov 10;28(25):3108-23. doi: 10.1002/sim.3661.

PMID:
19691022
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
20.

Effect of verification bias on screening for prostate cancer by measurement of prostate-specific antigen.

Punglia RS, D'Amico AV, Catalona WJ, Roehl KA, Kuntz KM.

N Engl J Med. 2003 Jul 24;349(4):335-42.

PMID:
12878740
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk