Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 114

1.
2.

Facial averageness and attractiveness in an isolated population of hunter-gatherers.

Apicella CL, Little AC, Marlowe FW.

Perception. 2007;36(12):1813-20.

PMID:
18283931
3.

Mate preferences among Hadza hunter-gatherers.

Marlowe FW.

Hum Nat. 2004 Dec;15(4):365-76. doi: 10.1007/s12110-004-1014-8.

PMID:
26189412
4.

Honey, Hadza, hunter-gatherers, and human evolution.

Marlowe FW, Berbesque JC, Wood B, Crittenden A, Porter C, Mabulla A.

J Hum Evol. 2014 Jun;71:119-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2014.03.006. Epub 2014 Apr 17.

PMID:
24746602
5.

Attractiveness of facial averageness and symmetry in non-western cultures: in search of biologically based standards of beauty.

Rhodes G, Yoshikawa S, Clark A, Lee K, McKay R, Akamatsu S.

Perception. 2001;30(5):611-25.

PMID:
11430245
6.

Tubers as fallback foods and their impact on Hadza hunter-gatherers.

Marlowe FW, Berbesque JC.

Am J Phys Anthropol. 2009 Dec;140(4):751-8. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.21040.

PMID:
19350623
7.

Exposure to visual cues of pathogen contagion changes preferences for masculinity and symmetry in opposite-sex faces.

Little AC, DeBruine LM, Jones BC.

Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Jul 7;278(1714):2032-9. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.1925. Epub 2010 Dec 1.

8.

Symmetry is related to sexual dimorphism in faces: data across culture and species.

Little AC, Jones BC, Waitt C, Tiddeman BP, Feinberg DR, Perrett DI, Apicella CL, Marlowe FW.

PLoS One. 2008 May 7;3(5):e2106. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002106.

9.

Evidence against perceptual bias views for symmetry preferences in human faces.

Little AC, Jones BC.

Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Sep 7;270(1526):1759-63.

10.

Averageness or symmetry: which is more important for facial attractiveness?

Komori M, Kawamura S, Ishihara S.

Acta Psychol (Amst). 2009 Jun;131(2):136-42. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.03.008. Epub 2009 Apr 25.

PMID:
19394585
11.

Perceived health contributes to the attractiveness of facial symmetry, averageness, and sexual dimorphism.

Rhodes G, Yoshikawa S, Palermo R, Simmons LW, Peters M, Lee K, Halberstadt J, Crawford JR.

Perception. 2007;36(8):1244-52.

PMID:
17972486
12.

Mixed-ethnicity face shape and attractiveness in humans.

Little AC, Hockings KJ, Apicella CL, Sousa C.

Perception. 2012;41(12):1486-96.

PMID:
23586288
13.

Facial aesthetics: babies prefer attractiveness to symmetry.

Samuels CA, Butterworth G, Roberts T, Graupner L, Hole G.

Perception. 2013;42(11):1244-52.

PMID:
24601036
14.

Preferences for symmetry in faces change across the menstrual cycle.

Little AC, Jones BC, Burt DM, Perrett DI.

Biol Psychol. 2007 Oct;76(3):209-16. Epub 2007 Aug 22.

PMID:
17919806
15.

Men's strategic preferences for femininity in female faces.

Little AC, Jones BC, Feinberg DR, Perrett DI.

Br J Psychol. 2014 Aug;105(3):364-81. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12043. Epub 2013 Jun 22. Erratum in: Br J Psychol. 2015 Feb;106(1):180.

PMID:
25040006
16.

The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty.

Rhodes G.

Annu Rev Psychol. 2006;57:199-226. Review.

PMID:
16318594
17.
18.

Aggression, digit ratio, and variation in the androgen receptor, serotonin transporter, and dopamine D4 receptor genes in African foragers: the Hadza.

Butovskaya ML, Vasilyev VA, Lazebny OE, Burkova VN, Kulikov AM, Mabulla A, Shibalev DV, Ryskov AP.

Behav Genet. 2012 Jul;42(4):647-62. doi: 10.1007/s10519-012-9533-2. Epub 2012 Mar 6.

PMID:
22392544
19.

Self-perceived attractiveness influences human female preferences for sexual dimorphism and symmetry in male faces.

Little AC, Burt DM, Penton-Voak IS, Perrett DI.

Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Jan 7;268(1462):39-44.

20.

Variation in facial masculinity and symmetry preferences across the menstrual cycle is moderated by relationship context.

Little AC, Jones BC.

Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2012 Jul;37(7):999-1008. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2011.11.007. Epub 2011 Dec 15.

PMID:
22172641
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk