Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 115

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 17574196)

1.

Debriefing with good judgment: combining rigorous feedback with genuine inquiry.

Rudolph JW, Simon R, Rivard P, Dufresne RL, Raemer DB.

Anesthesiol Clin. 2007 Jun;25(2):361-76. Review.

PMID:
17574196
2.
3.

Theories and styles of debriefing: the good judgment method as a tool for formative assessment in healthcare.

Maestre JM, Rudolph JW.

Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2015 Apr;68(4):282-5. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2014.05.018. Epub 2014 Sep 18. No abstract available.

PMID:
25239179
4.

Investigating novice doctors' reflections in debriefings after simulation scenarios.

Kihlgren P, Spanager L, Dieckmann P.

Med Teach. 2015 May;37(5):437-43. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.956054. Epub 2014 Sep 5.

PMID:
25189085
5.

Clinical judgment: developing skills in reflection.

[No authors listed]

J Nurses Prof Dev. 2014 May-Jun;30(3):157-8. doi: 10.1097/NND.0000000000000054. No abstract available.

PMID:
24845096
6.

The making of expert clinicians: reflective practice.

Maestre JM, Szyld D, Del Moral I, Ortiz G, Rudolph JW.

Rev Clin Esp (Barc). 2014 May;214(4):216-20. doi: 10.1016/j.rce.2013.12.001. Epub 2014 Jan 15. English, Spanish.

PMID:
24439667
7.

Helping without harming: the instructor's feedback dilemma in debriefing--a case study.

Rudolph JW, Foldy EG, Robinson T, Kendall S, Taylor SS, Simon R.

Simul Healthc. 2013 Oct;8(5):304-16. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e318294854e.

PMID:
24084647
8.

Reflection: moving from a mandatory ritual to meaningful professional development.

Murdoch-Eaton D, Sandars J.

Arch Dis Child. 2014 Mar;99(3):279-83. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2013-303948. Epub 2013 Aug 23. Review.

PMID:
23975720
9.
10.

High fidelity case-based simulation debriefing: everything you need to know.

Hart D, McNeil MA, Griswold-Theodorson S, Bhatia K, Joing S.

Acad Emerg Med. 2012 Sep;19(9):E1084. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2012.01423.x.

PMID:
22978737
11.

Is experience enough?

Chehade M.

Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2011 May-Jun;39(4):289-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2011.02588.x. No abstract available.

PMID:
21649807
12.

The 3D model of debriefing: defusing, discovering, and deepening.

Zigmont JJ, Kappus LJ, Sudikoff SN.

Semin Perinatol. 2011 Apr;35(2):52-8. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2011.01.003. Review.

PMID:
21440811
13.

Towards a framework for the elicitation of dilemmas.

Burger MJ.

Qual Quant. 2008 Aug;42(4):541-562. Epub 2007 Aug 8.

14.

Remediation of the deficiencies of physicians across the continuum from medical school to practice: a thematic review of the literature.

Hauer KE, Ciccone A, Henzel TR, Katsufrakis P, Miller SH, Norcross WA, Papadakis MA, Irby DM.

Acad Med. 2009 Dec;84(12):1822-32. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181bf3170. Review.

PMID:
19940595
15.

Recommendations on evidence needed to support measurement equivalence between electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures: ISPOR ePRO Good Research Practices Task Force report.

Coons SJ, Gwaltney CJ, Hays RD, Lundy JJ, Sloan JA, Revicki DA, Lenderking WR, Cella D, Basch E; ISPOR ePRO Task Force.

Value Health. 2009 Jun;12(4):419-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00470.x. Epub 2008 Nov 11.

PMID:
19900250
16.

Feasibility and outcomes of paid undergraduate student nurse positions.

Gamroth L, Budgen C, Lougheed M.

Nurs Leadersh (Tor Ont). 2006 Sep;19(3):e1-14.

PMID:
19830923
17.

Efficacy of high-fidelity simulation debriefing on the performance of practicing anaesthetists in simulated scenarios.

Morgan PJ, Tarshis J, LeBlanc V, Cleave-Hogg D, DeSousa S, Haley MF, Herold-McIlroy J, Law JA.

Br J Anaesth. 2009 Oct;103(4):531-7. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep222. Epub 2009 Aug 24.

18.

A universal model of diagnostic reasoning.

Croskerry P.

Acad Med. 2009 Aug;84(8):1022-8. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181ace703.

PMID:
19638766
19.

Helping novice nurses make effective clinical decisions: the situated clinical decision-making framework.

Gillespie M, Peterson BL.

Nurs Educ Perspect. 2009 May-Jun;30(3):164-70. Review.

PMID:
19606659
20.

Who wants feedback? An investigation of the variables influencing residents' feedback-seeking behavior in relation to night shifts.

Teunissen PW, Stapel DA, van der Vleuten C, Scherpbier A, Boor K, Scheele F.

Acad Med. 2009 Jul;84(7):910-7. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181a858ad.

PMID:
19550188
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk