Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 149

1.

Coronary artery calcium: a multi-institutional, multimanufacturer international standard for quantification at cardiac CT.

McCollough CH, Ulzheimer S, Halliburton SS, Shanneik K, White RD, Kalender WA.

Radiology. 2007 May;243(2):527-38.

PMID:
17456875
2.

Calcium score of small coronary calcifications on multidetector computed tomography: results from a static phantom study.

Groen JM, Kofoed KF, Zacho M, Vliegenthart R, Willems TP, Greuter MJ.

Eur J Radiol. 2013 Feb;82(2):e58-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.09.018. Epub 2012 Oct 23.

PMID:
23092538
4.

Measuring coronary calcium on CT images adjusted for attenuation differences.

Nelson JC, Kronmal RA, Carr JJ, McNitt-Gray MF, Wong ND, Loria CM, Goldin JG, Williams OD, Detrano R.

Radiology. 2005 May;235(2):403-14.

PMID:
15858082
5.

Controversies about effects of low-kilovoltage MDCT acquisition on Agatston calcium scoring.

Deprez FC, Vlassenbroek A, Ghaye B, Raaijmakers R, Coche E.

J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2013 Jan-Feb;7(1):58-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2012.11.006. Epub 2012 Dec 4.

PMID:
23333185
6.

Very low-dose coronary artery calcium scanning with high-pitch spiral acquisition mode: comparison between 120-kV and 100-kV tube voltage protocols.

Marwan M, Mettin C, Pflederer T, Seltmann M, Schuhbäck A, Muschiol G, Ropers D, Daniel WG, Achenbach S.

J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2013 Jan-Feb;7(1):32-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2012.11.004. Epub 2012 Dec 1.

PMID:
23333186
7.

Assessment of calcium scoring performance in cardiac computed tomography.

Ulzheimer S, Kalender WA.

Eur Radiol. 2003 Mar;13(3):484-97. Epub 2002 Dec 4.

PMID:
12594550
8.

Coronary artery calcium quantification at multi-detector row helical CT versus electron-beam CT.

Stanford W, Thompson BH, Burns TL, Heery SD, Burr MC.

Radiology. 2004 Feb;230(2):397-402.

PMID:
14752183
9.

Iterative image reconstruction techniques for CT coronary artery calcium quantification: comparison with traditional filtered back projection in vitro and in vivo.

Schindler A, Vliegenthart R, Schoepf UJ, Blanke P, Ebersberger U, Cho YJ, Allmendinger T, Vogt S, Raupach R, Fink C, Saam T, Bamberg F, Nikolaou K, Apfaltrer P.

Radiology. 2014 Feb;270(2):387-93. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13130233. Epub 2013 Nov 6.

PMID:
24471388
10.

Coronary artery calcium scoring on different 64-detector scanners using a low-tube voltage (80 kVp).

Fujioka C, Funama Y, Kiguchi M, Ishifuro M, Kihara Y, Nagata Y, Awai K.

Acad Radiol. 2012 Nov;19(11):1402-7. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2012.07.003. Epub 2012 Aug 25.

PMID:
22925933
11.
12.

Relationship between chest lateral width, tube current, image noise, and radiation exposure associated with coronary artery calcium scanning on 320-detector row CT.

Qian Z, Joshi PH, Shaukat AF, Laury T, Kirkland B, Meyers L, Drew A, Angel E, Krivitsky E, Bajpai A, Vazquez G, O'Rourke C, Carr JJ, Rinehart S, Voros S.

J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2011 Jul-Aug;5(4):231-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2011.06.006. Epub 2011 Jun 12.

PMID:
21723514
13.

Coronary calcium mass scores measured by identical 64-slice MDCT scanners are comparable: a cardiac phantom study.

Dijkstra H, Greuter MJ, Groen JM, Vliegenthart-Proença R, Renema KW, de Lange F, Oudkerk M.

Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010 Jan;26(1):89-98. doi: 10.1007/s10554-009-9503-9. Epub 2009 Sep 19.

14.

Evaluation of attenuation-based tube current control in coronary artery calcium scoring on prospective ECG-triggered 64-detector CT.

Horiguchi J, Matsuura N, Yamamoto H, Kitagawa T, Sato K, Kihara Y, Ito K.

Acad Radiol. 2009 Oct;16(10):1231-40. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2009.04.008. Epub 2009 Jun 9.

PMID:
19515586
15.

Interplatform reproducibility of CT coronary calcium scoring software.

Weininger M, Ritz KS, Schoepf UJ, Flohr TG, Vliegenthart R, Costello P, Hahn D, Beissert M.

Radiology. 2012 Oct;265(1):70-7. Epub 2012 Jul 6.

PMID:
22771886
16.

Coronary artery calcium measurement with multi-detector row CT and low radiation dose: comparison between 55 and 165 mAs.

Shemesh J, Evron R, Koren-Morag N, Apter S, Rozenman J, Shaham D, Itzchak Y, Motro M.

Radiology. 2005 Sep;236(3):810-4.

PMID:
16118162
17.

Assessment of isotropic calcium using 0.5-mm reconstructions from 320-row CT data sets identifies more patients with non-zero Agatston score and more subclinical atherosclerosis than standard 3.0-mm coronary artery calcium scan and CT angiography.

Aslam A, Khokhar US, Chaudhry A, Abramowicz A, Rajper N, Cortegiano M, Poon M, Voros S.

J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2014 Jan-Feb;8(1):58-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2013.12.007. Epub 2014 Jan 11.

PMID:
24582044
18.

Inter-scan variability of coronary artery calcium scoring assessed on 64-multidetector computed tomography vs. dual-source computed tomography: a head-to-head comparison.

Ghadri JR, Goetti R, Fiechter M, Pazhenkottil AP, Küest SM, Nkoulou RN, Windler C, Buechel RR, Herzog BA, Gaemperli O, Templin C, Kaufmann PA.

Eur Heart J. 2011 Aug;32(15):1865-74. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr157. Epub 2011 May 5.

19.

Coronary calcium measurements: effect of CT scanner type and calcium measure on rescan reproducibility--MESA study.

Detrano RC, Anderson M, Nelson J, Wong ND, Carr JJ, McNitt-Gray M, Bild DE.

Radiology. 2005 Aug;236(2):477-84. Epub 2005 Jun 21. Review.

PMID:
15972340
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk