Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 98

1.

Objective assessment of proficiency with bimanual inanimate tasks in robotic laparoscopy.

Narazaki K, Oleynikov D, Stergiou N.

J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2007 Feb;17(1):47-52.

PMID:
17362179
2.

Objective evaluation of expert and novice performance during robotic surgical training tasks.

Judkins TN, Oleynikov D, Stergiou N.

Surg Endosc. 2009 Mar;23(3):590-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-9933-9. Epub 2008 Apr 29.

PMID:
18443870
3.

The impact of environmental noise on robot-assisted laparoscopic surgical performance.

Siu KC, Suh IH, Mukherjee M, Oleynikov D, Stergiou N.

Surgery. 2010 Jan;147(1):107-13. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2009.08.010. Epub 2009 Oct 30.

PMID:
19879611
4.

Robotic surgery training and performance: identifying objective variables for quantifying the extent of proficiency.

Narazaki K, Oleynikov D, Stergiou N.

Surg Endosc. 2006 Jan;20(1):96-103. Epub 2005 Dec 7. Erratum in: Surg Endosc. 2006 Feb;20(2):344.

PMID:
16374675
5.

A comparison of laparoscopic and robotic assisted suturing performance by experts and novices.

Chandra V, Nehra D, Parent R, Woo R, Reyes R, Hernandez-Boussard T, Dutta S.

Surgery. 2010 Jun;147(6):830-9. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2009.11.002. Epub 2009 Dec 31.

PMID:
20045162
6.

Proficiency-based training for robotic surgery: construct validity, workload, and expert levels for nine inanimate exercises.

Dulan G, Rege RV, Hogg DC, Gilberg-Fisher KM, Arain NA, Tesfay ST, Scott DJ.

Surg Endosc. 2012 Jun;26(6):1516-21. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-2102-6. Epub 2012 Feb 21.

PMID:
22350226
7.

Validated robotic laparoscopic surgical training in a virtual-reality environment.

Katsavelis D, Siu KC, Brown-Clerk B, Lee IH, Lee YK, Oleynikov D, Stergiou N.

Surg Endosc. 2009 Jan;23(1):66-73. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-9894-z. Epub 2008 Apr 10.

PMID:
18401648
8.

Comparative assessment of three standardized robotic surgery training methods.

Hung AJ, Jayaratna IS, Teruya K, Desai MM, Gill IS, Goh AC.

BJU Int. 2013 Oct;112(6):864-71. doi: 10.1111/bju.12045. Epub 2013 Mar 7.

9.

Training program for fundamental surgical skill in robotic laparoscopic surgery.

Suh I, Mukherjee M, Oleynikov D, Siu KC.

Int J Med Robot. 2011 Sep;7(3):327-33. doi: 10.1002/rcs.402. Epub 2011 Jun 17.

PMID:
21688381
10.

Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic and urologic oncology: an evidence-based analysis.

Health Quality Ontario.

Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2010;10(27):1-118. Epub 2010 Dec 1.

11.

Comparison of laparoscopic skills performance between standard instruments and two surgical robotic systems.

Dakin GF, Gagner M.

Surg Endosc. 2003 Apr;17(4):574-9. Epub 2003 Feb 17.

PMID:
12582769
12.

Virtual reality for robotic laparoscopic surgical training.

Fiedler MJ, Chen SJ, Judkins TN, Oleynikov D, Stergiou N.

Stud Health Technol Inform. 2007;125:127-9.

PMID:
17377249
13.

Learning curve using robotic surgery.

Kaul S, Shah NL, Menon M.

Curr Urol Rep. 2006 Mar;7(2):125-9. Review.

PMID:
16526997
14.

Measurements of the level of surgical expertise using flight path analysis from da Vinci robotic surgical system.

Verner L, Oleynikov D, Holtmann S, Haider H, Zhukov L.

Stud Health Technol Inform. 2003;94:373-8.

PMID:
15455928
15.

Which skills really matter? proving face, content, and construct validity for a commercial robotic simulator.

Lyons C, Goldfarb D, Jones SL, Badhiwala N, Miles B, Link R, Dunkin BJ.

Surg Endosc. 2013 Jun;27(6):2020-30. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2704-7. Epub 2013 Feb 7.

PMID:
23389060
16.

Multi-Institutional Validation of Fundamental Inanimate Robotic Skills Tasks.

Goh AC, Aghazadeh MA, Mercado MA, Hung AJ, Pan MM, Desai MM, Gill IS, Dunkin BJ.

J Urol. 2015 Dec;194(6):1751-6. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.04.125. Epub 2015 Jul 18.

PMID:
26196733
17.

Manual Ambidexterity Predicts Robotic Surgical Proficiency.

Yang JY, Son YG, Kim TH, Park JH, Huh YJ, Suh YS, Kong SH, Lee HJ, Kim S, Yang HK.

J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2015 Dec;25(12):1009-18. doi: 10.1089/lap.2015.0288.

PMID:
26673533
18.

Kinematics effectively delineate accomplished users of endovascular robotics with a physical training model.

Duran C, Estrada S, O'Malley M, Lumsden AB, Bismuth J.

J Vasc Surg. 2015 Feb;61(2):535-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.10.104.

PMID:
25619579
19.

Validation of a virtual reality-based robotic surgical skills curriculum.

Connolly M, Seligman J, Kastenmeier A, Goldblatt M, Gould JC.

Surg Endosc. 2014 May;28(5):1691-4. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3373-x. Epub 2014 Jan 1.

PMID:
24380993
20.

Face, content, construct and concurrent validity of dry laboratory exercises for robotic training using a global assessment tool.

Ramos P, Montez J, Tripp A, Ng CK, Gill IS, Hung AJ.

BJU Int. 2014 May;113(5):836-42. doi: 10.1111/bju.12559. Epub 2014 Mar 20.

Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk