Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 96

1.

Analyses by the intention-to-treat principle in randomized trials and databases.

Yusuf S, Garg R, Zucker D.

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1991 Dec;14(12):2078-82. No abstract available.

PMID:
1723188
2.

Control group bias in randomized atypical antipsychotic medication trials for schizophrenia.

Woods SW, Gueorguieva RV, Baker CB, Makuch RW.

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005 Sep;62(9):961-70. Review.

PMID:
16143728
3.

Should meta-analysts search Embase in addition to Medline?

Sampson M, Barrowman NJ, Moher D, Klassen TP, Pham B, Platt R, St John PD, Viola R, Raina P.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2003 Oct;56(10):943-55.

PMID:
14568625
4.

Statistical methods for clinical trials.

Bailey A, Crook A, Machin D.

Blood Rev. 1994 Jun;8(2):105-12.

PMID:
7950475
5.

The intention-to-treat principle in clinical trials and meta-analyses of leukoreduced blood transfusions in surgical patients.

Blumberg N, Zhao H, Wang H, Messing S, Heal JM, Lyman GH.

Transfusion. 2007 Apr;47(4):573-81.

PMID:
17381614
6.

[Intention-to-treat].

Faller H.

Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2004 Feb;43(1):52-5. German.

PMID:
14963806
7.

The intention-to-treat principle in clinical trials and meta-analyses of leukoreduced blood transfusions in surgical patients.

van de Watering L.

Transfusion. 2007 Oct;47(10):1946; author reply 1947-8. No abstract available.

PMID:
17880626
8.

[Randomized and nonrandomized controlled clinical trials in a German surgical journal].

Diener MK, Blümle A, Szakallas V, Antes G, Seiler CM.

Chirurg. 2006 Sep;77(9):837-43. German.

PMID:
16850289
9.
10.
11.

Investigating patient exclusion bias in meta-analysis.

Tierney JF, Stewart LA.

Int J Epidemiol. 2005 Feb;34(1):79-87. Epub 2004 Nov 23.

12.

Cluster randomized controlled trials.

Puffer S, Torgerson DJ, Watson J.

J Eval Clin Pract. 2005 Oct;11(5):479-83.

PMID:
16164589
13.

Sources of evidence for systematic reviews of interventions in diabetes.

Royle PL, Bain L, Waugh NR.

Diabet Med. 2005 Oct;22(10):1386-93.

PMID:
16176201
14.
15.

New algorithm for treatment allocation reduced selection bias and loss of power in small trials.

Hofmeijer J, Anema PC, van der Tweel I.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Feb;61(2):119-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.04.002. Epub 2007 Aug 23.

PMID:
18177784
16.

Intention-to-treat vs. on-treatment analyses of clinical trial data: experience from a study of pyrimethamine in the primary prophylaxis of toxoplasmosis in HIV-infected patients. ANRS 005/ACTG 154 Trial Group.

Chêne G, Morlat P, Leport C, Hafner R, Dequae L, Charreau I, Aboulker JP, Luft B, Aubertin J, Vildé JL, Salamon R.

Control Clin Trials. 1998 Jun;19(3):233-48.

PMID:
9620807
17.

Selection of patients for randomized controlled trials: implications of wide or narrow eligibility criteria.

Yusuf S, Held P, Teo KK, Toretsky ER.

Stat Med. 1990 Jan-Feb;9(1-2):73-83; discussion 83-6.

PMID:
2345840
18.

Contamination in trials of educational interventions.

Keogh-Brown MR, Bachmann MO, Shepstone L, Hewitt C, Howe A, Ramsay CR, Song F, Miles JN, Torgerson DJ, Miles S, Elbourne D, Harvey I, Campbell MJ.

Health Technol Assess. 2007 Oct;11(43):iii, ix-107. Review.

20.

Commentary: searching for trials for systematic reviews: what difference does it make?

Clarke M.

Int J Epidemiol. 2002 Feb;31(1):123-4. No abstract available.

Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk