Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 100

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 17098577)

1.

Bivariate meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity with sparse data: a generalized linear mixed model approach.

Chu H, Cole SR.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Dec;59(12):1331-2; author reply 1332-3. Epub 2006 Sep 28. No abstract available.

PMID:
17098577
2.

Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews.

Reitsma JB, Glas AS, Rutjes AW, Scholten RJ, Bossuyt PM, Zwinderman AH.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 Oct;58(10):982-90. Review.

PMID:
16168343
3.

Bivariate random-effects meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity with SAS PROC GLIMMIX.

Menke J.

Methods Inf Med. 2010;49(1):54-62, 62-4. doi: 10.3414/ME09-01-0001. Epub 2009 Nov 20.

PMID:
19936437
4.

The meta-analysis of diagnostic test studies.

Boissel J, Cucherat M.

Eur Radiol. 1998;8(3):484-7. No abstract available.

PMID:
9510593
5.

Multivariate random-effects approach: for meta-analysis of cancer staging studies.

Bipat S, Zwinderman AH, Bossuyt PM, Stoker J.

Acad Radiol. 2007 Aug;14(8):974-84.

PMID:
17659244
6.

The binomial distribution of meta-analysis was preferred to model within-study variability.

Hamza TH, van Houwelingen HC, Stijnen T.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Jan;61(1):41-51. Epub 2007 Aug 23.

PMID:
18083461
7.

Differences between univariate and bivariate models for summarizing diagnostic accuracy may not be large.

Simel DL, Bossuyt PM.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Dec;62(12):1292-300. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.02.007. Epub 2009 May 17.

PMID:
19447007
8.

Bivariate random effects meta-analysis of ROC curves.

Arends LR, Hamza TH, van Houwelingen JC, Heijenbrok-Kal MH, Hunink MG, Stijnen T.

Med Decis Making. 2008 Sep-Oct;28(5):621-38. doi: 10.1177/0272989X08319957. Epub 2008 Jun 30.

PMID:
18591542
9.

Diagnostic statistical procedures in medical meta-analyses.

Olkin I.

Stat Med. 1999 Sep 15-30;18(17-18):2331-41.

PMID:
10474143
10.

Publication bias in research synthesis: sensitivity analysis using a priori weight functions.

Vevea JL, Woods CM.

Psychol Methods. 2005 Dec;10(4):428-43.

PMID:
16392998
11.

We should not pool diagnostic likelihood ratios in systematic reviews.

Zwinderman AH, Bossuyt PM.

Stat Med. 2008 Feb 28;27(5):687-97.

PMID:
17611957
12.

Meta-analysis of diagnostic studies: a comparison of random intercept, normal-normal, and binomial-normal bivariate summary ROC approaches.

Hamza TH, Reitsma JB, Stijnen T.

Med Decis Making. 2008 Sep-Oct;28(5):639-49. doi: 10.1177/0272989X08323917. Epub 2008 Aug 27.

PMID:
18753684
13.

Meta-analysis of diagnostic test studies using individual patient data and aggregate data.

Riley RD, Dodd SR, Craig JV, Thompson JR, Williamson PR.

Stat Med. 2008 Dec 20;27(29):6111-36. doi: 10.1002/sim.3441.

PMID:
18816508
14.

Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests. Two issues were simplified.

ter Riet G, Kessels AG, Bachmann LM.

BMJ. 2001 Nov 17;323(7322):1188. No abstract available.

PMID:
11794254
15.
16.

[Meta-analyses based on individual patient data (IPD)].

Bekkering GE, Cools F, Aertgeerts B, de Backer TL, Kellen E, van der Stichele RH, Buntinx F.

Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2009 Feb 28;153(9):402-6. Review. Dutch. No abstract available.

PMID:
19348098
17.

Commentary on the dual-vision method for analysis of agreement data.

Walter SD, Guyatt GH, Haynes RB, Irwig L.

Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2003;63(7-8):529-31. No abstract available.

PMID:
14743964
18.

Meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies accounting for disease prevalence: alternative parameterizations and model selection.

Chu H, Nie L, Cole SR, Poole C.

Stat Med. 2009 Aug 15;28(18):2384-99. doi: 10.1002/sim.3627.

PMID:
19499551
19.

[Insufficient studies of diagnostic cancer tests. Neither systematic review nor original studies come up to expectations].

Holmberg L.

Lakartidningen. 2007 Apr 25-May 1;104(17):1308-9. Swedish. No abstract available.

PMID:
17547275
20.

Meta-analysis using linear mixed models.

Sheu CF, Suzuki S.

Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2001 May;33(2):102-7.

PMID:
11447661
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk