Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 1690

Related Citations for PubMed (Select 17063274)

1.

Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in screening detected microcalcification lesions of the breast: is there any value?

Uematsu T, Yuen S, Kasami M, Uchida Y.

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2007 Jul;103(3):269-81. Epub 2006 Oct 25.

PMID:
17063274
2.

Contrast-enhanced MR imaging in patients with BI-RADS 3-5 microcalcifications.

Cilotti A, Iacconi C, Marini C, Moretti M, Mazzotta D, Traino C, Naccarato AG, Piagneri V, Giaconi C, Bevilacqua G, Bartolozzi C.

Radiol Med. 2007 Mar;112(2):272-86. Epub 2007 Mar 19. English, Italian.

PMID:
17361370
3.

The value of dynamic contrast enhanced breast MRI in mammographically detected BI-RADS 5 microcalcifications.

Houserkova D, Prasad SN, Svach I, Kucerova L, Duskova M, Bucil J, Sisola I, Zlamalova N, Svebisova H.

Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2008 Jun;152(1):107-15.

4.

Role of magnetic resonance imaging in probably benign (BI-RADS category 3) microcalcifications of the breast.

Linda A, Zuiani C, Londero V, Di Gaetano E, Dal Col A, Girometti R, Bazzocchi M.

Radiol Med. 2014 Jun;119(6):393-9. doi: 10.1007/s11547-013-0361-0. Epub 2013 Dec 3.

PMID:
24297595
5.

MR imaging in probably benign lesions (BI-RADS category 3) of the breast.

Gökalp G, Topal U.

Eur J Radiol. 2006 Mar;57(3):436-44. Epub 2005 Nov 28.

PMID:
16316732
6.

Usefulness and limitations of the Japan Mammography Guidelines for the categorization of microcalcifications.

Uematsu T, Kasami M, Yuen S.

Breast Cancer. 2008;15(4):291-7. doi: 10.1007/s12282-008-0033-4. Epub 2008 Feb 21.

PMID:
18288569
7.

Contrast-enhanced MR mammography for evaluation of the contralateral breast in patients with diagnosed unilateral breast cancer or high-risk lesions.

Pediconi F, Catalano C, Roselli A, Padula S, Altomari F, Moriconi E, Pronio AM, Kirchin MA, Passariello R.

Radiology. 2007 Jun;243(3):670-80. Epub 2007 Apr 19.

PMID:
17446524
8.

[Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy--success, histologic accuracy, patient acceptance and optimizing the BI-RADSTM-correlated indication].

Siegmann KC, Wersebe A, Fischmann A, Fersis N, Vogel U, Claussen CD, Müller-Schimpfle M.

Rofo. 2003 Jan;175(1):99-104. German.

PMID:
12525989
9.
10.

Mammographic features and correlation with biopsy findings using 11-gauge stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (SVABB).

Mendez A, Cabanillas F, Echenique M, Malekshamran K, Perez I, Ramos E.

Ann Oncol. 2004 Mar;15(3):450-4. Review.

11.

Positive predictive value of BI-RADS MR imaging.

Mahoney MC, Gatsonis C, Hanna L, DeMartini WB, Lehman C.

Radiology. 2012 Jul;264(1):51-8. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12110619. Epub 2012 May 15.

12.

Diagnostic accuracy of high-resolution MRI using a microscopy coil for patients with presumed DCIS following mammography screening.

Zhu J, Kurihara Y, Kanemaki Y, Ogata H, Fukuda M, Nakajima Y, Maeda I.

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007 Jan;25(1):96-103.

PMID:
17154376
13.

Differentiation of benign from malignant breast disease associated with screening detected microcalcifications using dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

Kneeshaw PJ, Lowry M, Manton D, Hubbard A, Drew PJ, Turnbull LW.

Breast. 2006 Feb;15(1):29-38. Epub 2005 Jul 5.

PMID:
16002292
14.

Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsies in 500 women with microcalcifications: radiological and pathological correlations.

Kettritz U, Morack G, Decker T.

Eur J Radiol. 2005 Aug;55(2):270-6. Epub 2004 Dec 13.

PMID:
16036159
15.

Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in 268 nonpalpable lesions.

Tonegutti M, Girardi V.

Radiol Med. 2008 Feb;113(1):65-75. doi: 10.1007/s11547-008-0226-0. Epub 2008 Feb 25. English, Italian.

PMID:
18338128
16.

Characterization of breast lesions with CE-MR multimodal morphological and kinetic analysis: comparison with conventional mammography and high-resolution ultrasound.

Vassiou K, Kanavou T, Vlychou M, Poultsidi A, Athanasiou E, Arvanitis DL, Fezoulidis IV.

Eur J Radiol. 2009 Apr;70(1):69-76. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.01.012. Epub 2008 Mar 4.

PMID:
18295425
17.

CE-Magnetic Resonance Mammography for the evaluation of the contralateral breast in patients with diagnosed breast cancer.

Pediconi F, Venditti F, Padula S, Roselli A, Moriconi E, Giacomelli L, Catalano C, Passariello R.

Radiol Med. 2005 Jul-Aug;110(1-2):61-8. English, Italian.

PMID:
16163140
18.

The clinical value of bilateral breast MR imaging: is it worth performing on patients showing suspicious microcalcifications on mammography?

Akita A, Tanimoto A, Jinno H, Kameyama K, Kuribayashi S.

Eur Radiol. 2009 Sep;19(9):2089-96. doi: 10.1007/s00330-009-1396-4. Epub 2009 Apr 7.

PMID:
19350244
19.

Evaluation of the role of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging for patients with BI-RADS 3-4 microcalcifications.

Jiang Y, Lou J, Wang S, Zhao Y, Wang C, Wang D.

PLoS One. 2014 Jun 13;9(6):e99669. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099669. eCollection 2014.

20.

Evaluation of the stereotactic 8G vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in the histologic evaluation of suspicious mammography findings (BI-RADS IV).

Diebold T, Hahn T, Solbach C, Rody A, Balzer JO, Hansmann ML, Marx A, Viana F, Peters J, Jacobi V, Kaufmann M, Vogl TJ.

Invest Radiol. 2005 Jul;40(7):465-71.

PMID:
15973139
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk