Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 732

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 16949498)

1.

What is the prognostic value of myocardial perfusion imaging using rubidium-82 positron emission tomography?

Yoshinaga K, Chow BJ, Williams K, Chen L, deKemp RA, Garrard L, Lok-Tin Szeto A, Aung M, Davies RA, Ruddy TD, Beanlands RS.

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Sep 5;48(5):1029-39. Epub 2006 Aug 17.

2.

Effect of changes in perfusion defect size during serial regadenoson myocardial perfusion imaging on cardiovascular outcomes in high-risk patients.

El-Hajj S, AlJaroudi WA, Farag A, Bleich S, Manaoragada P, Iskandrian AE, Hage FG.

J Nucl Cardiol. 2015 May 28. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
26017713
3.

Comparison of the prognostic value of regadenoson and adenosine myocardial perfusion imaging.

Farzaneh-Far A, Shaw LK, Dunning A, Oldan JD, O'Connor CM, Borges-Neto S.

J Nucl Cardiol. 2015 May 19. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
25987234
4.

Interest of PET-scan in the management of severe hyperparathyroidism.

Migali G, Lecouvet F, Lonneux M, Goffin E.

NDT Plus. 2009 Feb;2(1):84-6. doi: 10.1093/ndtplus/sfn154. Epub 2008 Sep 30. No abstract available.

5.

Proceedings of the ASNC Cardiac PET Summit, 12 May 2014, Baltimore, MD : 1: The value of PET: Integrating cardiovascular PET into the care continuum.

Beanlands R, Heller GV.

J Nucl Cardiol. 2015 Jun;22(3):557-62. doi: 10.1007/s12350-015-0129-0. Epub 2015 Apr 24. No abstract available.

PMID:
25907354
6.

Basal hyperaemia is the primary abnormality of perfusion in Takotsubo cardiomyopathy: a quantitative cardiac perfusion positron emission tomography study.

Christensen TE, Ahtarovski KA, Bang LE, Holmvang L, Søholm H, Ghotbi AA, Andersson H, Vejlstrup N, Ihlemann N, Engstrøm T, Kjær A, Hasbak P.

Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Apr 6. pii: jev065. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
25851324
7.

Feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of exercise treadmill nitrogen-13 ammonia PET myocardial perfusion imaging of obese patients.

Aggarwal NR, Drozdova A, Wells Askew J 3rd, Kemp BJ, Chareonthaitawee P.

J Nucl Cardiol. 2015 Mar 17. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
25777780
8.

Changes in ischaemia as assessed with single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging in high-risk patients with diabetes without cardiac symptoms: relation with coronary atherosclerosis on computed tomography coronary angiography.

de Graaf MA, Roos CJ, Mansveld JM, Kharagjitsingh AV, Dibbets-Schneider P, Kroft LJ, Jukema JW, Ficaro EP, Bax JJ, Scholte AJ.

Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Feb 13. pii: jev003. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
25680384
9.

The prognostic value of regadenoson myocardial perfusion imaging.

Hage FG, Ghimire G, Lester D, Mckay J, Bleich S, El-Hajj S, Iskandrian AE.

J Nucl Cardiol. 2015 Feb 14. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
25677160
10.

External validation of models for estimating pretest probability of coronary artery disease among individuals undergoing myocardial perfusion imaging.

Williams BA, Ladapo JA, Merhige ME.

Int J Cardiol. 2015 Mar 1;182:534-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.01.015. Epub 2015 Jan 6.

PMID:
25665971
11.

Temporal trends in results of 9170 myocardial perfusion imaging studies (2004 to 2013).

Zaman Mu, Fatima N, Zaman U, Zaman A, Rasheed SZ, Baloch DJ.

Nucl Med Rev Cent East Eur. 2015;18(1):19-24. doi: 10.5603/NMR.2015.0005.

12.

Mixture of ischemia and hibernation in a patient with severe diagonal disease: Value of perfusion and metabolic PET imaging.

Harb S, Ismaeel H, Bassiouny M, Jaber WA.

J Nucl Cardiol. 2015 Jan 8. [Epub ahead of print] No abstract available.

PMID:
25566824
13.

Incidental mammary fibromyoblastoma on 82Rb myocardial perfusion imaging.

Pelletier-Galarneau M, Martineau P, Davies RA.

Clin Nucl Med. 2015 Apr;40(4):343-4. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000000645.

PMID:
25546224
14.

Evaluating the prognostic value of selected prognostic scales in patients operated on due to peritonitis.

Paduszyńska K, Kaczka K, Dworzyńska A, Sieniawski K, Pomorski L.

Pol Przegl Chir. 2014 Dec 18;86(9):422-8. doi: 10.2478/pjs-2014-0075.

PMID:
25527805
15.

The yield, safety and prognostic value of myocardial perfusion imaging with positron emission tomography for risk stratification of high risk chest pain patients.

Suliman I, AlJizeeri A, Naseem M, Naveed M, AlZaibag M, Al-Mallah M.

J Nucl Cardiol. 2015 Apr;22(2):396-7. doi: 10.1007/s12350-014-0038-7. Epub 2014 Dec 11. No abstract available.

PMID:
25500800
16.

Added prognostic value of ischaemic threshold in radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging: a common-sense integration of exercise tolerance and ischaemia severity.

Marini C, Acampa W, Bauckneht M, Daniele S, Capitanio S, Cantoni V, Fiz F, Zampella E, Dib B, Assante R, Bruzzi P, Sambuceti G, Cuocolo A.

Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015 Apr;42(5):750-60. doi: 10.1007/s00259-014-2963-8. Epub 2014 Dec 5.

PMID:
25476258
17.

How close is close enough?

Gewirtz H.

JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Nov;7(11):1128-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2014.09.001. Epub 2014 Nov 10. No abstract available.

PMID:
25459594
18.

Comparison and prognostic validation of multiple methods of quantification of myocardial blood flow with 82Rb PET.

Murthy VL, Lee BC, Sitek A, Naya M, Moody J, Polavarapu V, Ficaro EP, Di Carli MF.

J Nucl Med. 2014 Dec;55(12):1952-8. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.114.145342.

PMID:
25429160
19.

Effective risk stratification of patients on the basis of myocardial perfusion SPECT is dependent on appropriate patient selection.

Alexander S, Doukky R.

Curr Cardiol Rep. 2015 Jan;17(1):549. doi: 10.1007/s11886-014-0549-5.

PMID:
25418932
20.

Predicting outcomes in heart transplantation: PET project or actionable data.

Givertz MM.

Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Nov;7(6):857-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.114.002581. No abstract available.

PMID:
25406196
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk