Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 123

1.

The effect of graded monetary reward on cognitive event-related potentials and behavior in young healthy adults.

Goldstein RZ, Cottone LA, Jia Z, Maloney T, Volkow ND, Squires NK.

Int J Psychophysiol. 2006 Nov;62(2):272-9. Epub 2006 Jul 31.

2.

Long-lasting effects of performance-contingent unconscious and conscious reward incentives during cued task-switching.

Capa RL, Bouquet CA, Dreher JC, Dufour A.

Cortex. 2013 Jul-Aug;49(7):1943-54. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2012.05.018. Epub 2012 Jun 12.

PMID:
22770561
3.

Task preparation processes related to reward prediction precede those related to task-difficulty expectation.

Schevernels H, Krebs RM, Santens P, Woldorff MG, Boehler CN.

Neuroimage. 2014 Jan 1;84:639-47. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.09.039. Epub 2013 Sep 21.

4.

Event-related components of the punishment and reward sensitivity.

De Pascalis V, Varriale V, D'Antuono L.

Clin Neurophysiol. 2010 Jan;121(1):60-76. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.10.004. Epub 2009 Nov 8.

PMID:
19900840
5.

On the relation of movement-related potentials to the go/no-go effect on P3.

Verleger R, Paehge T, Kolev V, Yordanova J, Jaśkowski P.

Biol Psychol. 2006 Oct;73(3):298-313. Epub 2006 Jul 11.

PMID:
16837117
6.

An electrophysiological monetary incentive delay (e-MID) task: a way to decompose the different components of neural response to positive and negative monetary reinforcement.

Broyd SJ, Richards HJ, Helps SK, Chronaki G, Bamford S, Sonuga-Barke EJ.

J Neurosci Methods. 2012 Jul 30;209(1):40-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2012.05.015. Epub 2012 May 30.

PMID:
22659003
7.

CNV resolution does not cause NoGo anteriorisation of the P3: a failure to replicate Simson et al.

Smith JL, Barry RJ, Steiner GZ.

Int J Psychophysiol. 2013 Sep;89(3):349-57. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2013.05.002. Epub 2013 May 10.

PMID:
23669175
8.
9.

Modifications of cognitive and motor tasks affect the occurrence of event-related potentials in the human cortex.

Rektor I, Brázdil M, Nestrasil I, Bares M, Daniel P.

Eur J Neurosci. 2007 Sep;26(5):1371-80.

PMID:
17767513
10.

Parafac and go/no-go: disentangling CNV return from the P3 complex by trilinear component analysis.

Verleger R, Paulick C, Möcks J, Smith JL, Keller K.

Int J Psychophysiol. 2013 Mar;87(3):289-300. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2012.08.003. Epub 2012 Aug 17.

PMID:
22902314
11.

The effects of acute abstinence from smoking and performance-based rewards on performance monitoring.

Schlienz NJ, Hawk LW Jr, Rosch KS.

Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2013 Oct;229(4):701-11. doi: 10.1007/s00213-013-3131-8. Epub 2013 May 17.

12.

Modulation of neural activity by motivational and spatial biases.

Baines S, Ruz M, Rao A, Denison R, Nobre AC.

Neuropsychologia. 2011 Jul;49(9):2489-97. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.04.029. Epub 2011 May 5.

PMID:
21570417
13.

Compromised sensitivity to monetary reward in current cocaine users: an ERP study.

Goldstein RZ, Parvaz MA, Maloney T, Alia-Klein N, Woicik PA, Telang F, Wang GJ, Volkow ND.

Psychophysiology. 2008 Sep;45(5):705-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00670.x. Epub 2008 May 30.

14.

Motivation and movement: the effect of monetary incentive on performance speed.

Mir P, Trender-Gerhard I, Edwards MJ, Schneider SA, Bhatia KP, Jahanshahi M.

Exp Brain Res. 2011 Apr;209(4):551-9. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2583-5. Epub 2011 Feb 20.

PMID:
21337028
15.

Movement-related potentials in the Go/NoGo task: the P3 reflects both cognitive and motor inhibition.

Smith JL, Johnstone SJ, Barry RJ.

Clin Neurophysiol. 2008 Mar;119(3):704-14. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.11.042.

PMID:
18164657
16.

Cognitive potentials in the basal ganglia-frontocortical circuits. An intracerebral recording study.

Rektor I, Bares M, Kanovský P, Brázdil M, Klajblová I, Streitová H, Rektorová I, Sochůrková D, Kubová D, Kuba R, Daniel P.

Exp Brain Res. 2004 Oct;158(3):289-301. Epub 2004 Jun 22.

PMID:
15221170
17.

Cluster analysis of behavioural and event-related potentials during a contingent negative variation paradigm in remitting-relapsing and benign forms of multiple sclerosis.

Gonzalez-Rosa JJ, Vazquez-Marrufo M, Vaquero E, Duque P, Borges M, Gomez-Gonzalez CM, Izquierdo G.

BMC Neurol. 2011 Jun 2;11:64. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-11-64.

18.

Primary and secondary rewards differentially modulate neural activity dynamics during working memory.

Beck SM, Locke HS, Savine AC, Jimura K, Braver TS.

PLoS One. 2010 Feb 16;5(2):e9251. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009251.

19.

The role of monetary incentives in feedback processing: why we should pay our participants.

Van den Berg I, Shaul L, Van der Veen FM, Franken IH.

Neuroreport. 2012 Apr 18;23(6):347-53. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e328351db2f.

PMID:
22395657
20.

Effects of pre-stimulus processing on subsequent events in a warned Go/NoGo paradigm: response preparation, execution and inhibition.

Smith JL, Johnstone SJ, Barry RJ.

Int J Psychophysiol. 2006 Aug;61(2):121-33. Epub 2005 Oct 7.

PMID:
16214250
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk