Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 127

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 16622139)

1.

Neuropsychological and renal effects of dental amalgam in children: a randomized clinical trial.

Bellinger DC, Trachtenberg F, Barregard L, Tavares M, Cernichiari E, Daniel D, McKinlay S.

JAMA. 2006 Apr 19;295(15):1775-83.

PMID:
16622139
2.

Amalgam and resin composite longevity of posterior restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Moraschini V, Fai CK, Alto RM, Dos Santos GO.

J Dent. 2015 Jun 24. pii: S0300-5712(15)00144-X. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.06.005. [Epub ahead of print] Review.

PMID:
26116767
3.

Patients' experiences of changes in health complaints before, during, and after removal of dental amalgam.

Sjursen TT, Binder PE, Lygre GB, Helland V, Dalen K, Björkman L.

Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2015 Jun 24;10:28157. doi: 10.3402/qhw.v10.28157. eCollection 2015.

4.

Trend of posterior teeth restoration at ibadan, Nigeria.

Gbadebo SO, Anifowose OO, Ogunrinde TJ.

J West Afr Coll Surg. 2013 Oct-Dec;3(4):70-83.

5.
6.

Opinion on environmental risks and indirect health effects of mercury from dental amalgam.

Scientific Committee SCHER, Linders J, Janssen C, Testai E, Vighi M, Dekant W, Munth J, Pirrone N, Richardson M.

Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2015 Jun;72(1):85-6. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2015.03.006. Epub 2015 Mar 24. No abstract available.

PMID:
25817735
7.

A study of sister chromatid exchange in patients with dental amalgam restorations.

Priya EL, Ranganathan K, Rao UD, Joshua E, Mathew DG, Wilson K.

Indian J Dent Res. 2014 Nov-Dec;25(6):772-6. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.152203.

8.

Dental amalgam phase-down.

Yui KC.

J Contemp Dent Pract. 2014 Jul 1;15(4):i. No abstract available.

PMID:
25576125
9.

Longitudinal analysis of the association between removal of dental amalgam, urine mercury and 14 self-reported health symptoms.

Zwicker JD, Dutton DJ, Emery JC.

Environ Health. 2014 Nov 18;13:95. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-13-95.

10.

The critical time-lapse between various restoration placements and subsequent endodontic intervention.

Kwang S, Aminoshariae A, Harding J, Montagnese TA, Mickel A.

J Endod. 2014 Dec;40(12):1922-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.08.005. Epub 2014 Sep 27.

PMID:
25266464
11.

Genetic polymorphisms affecting susceptibility to mercury neurotoxicity in children: summary findings from the Casa Pia Children's Amalgam clinical trial.

Woods JS, Heyer NJ, Russo JE, Martin MD, Farin FM.

Neurotoxicology. 2014 Sep;44:288-302. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2014.07.010. Epub 2014 Aug 7.

PMID:
25109824
12.

The influence of different restorative materials on secondary caries development in situ.

van de Sande FH, Opdam NJ, Truin GJ, Bronkhorst EM, de Soet JJ, Cenci MS, Huysmans MC.

J Dent. 2014 Sep;42(9):1171-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.07.003. Epub 2014 Jul 8.

PMID:
25010541
13.

Dental sealants and flowable composite restorations and psychosocial, neuropsychological, and physical development in children.

Maserejian NN, Shrader P, Trachtenberg FL, Hauser R, Bellinger DC, Tavares M.

Pediatr Dent. 2014 Jan-Feb;36(1):68-75.

PMID:
24717713
14.

Direct composite resin fillings versus amalgam fillings for permanent or adult posterior teeth.

Rasines Alcaraz MG, Veitz-Keenan A, Sahrmann P, Schmidlin PR, Davis D, Iheozor-Ejiofor Z.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Mar 31;3:CD005620. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005620.pub2. Review.

PMID:
24683067
15.

Randomized clinical trial of adhesive restorations in primary molars. 18-month results.

Casagrande L, Dalpian DM, Ardenghi TM, Zanatta FB, Balbinot CE, García-Godoy F, De Araujo FB.

Am J Dent. 2013 Dec;26(6):351-5.

PMID:
24640441
16.

Acceptability of different caries management methods for primary molars in a RCT.

Santamaria RM, Innes NP, Machiulskiene V, Evans DJ, Alkilzy M, Splieth CH.

Int J Paediatr Dent. 2015 Jan;25(1):9-17. doi: 10.1111/ipd.12097. Epub 2014 Mar 7.

PMID:
24602167
17.

Dental composite materials and renal function in children.

Trachtenberg FL, Shrader P, Barregard L, Maserejian NN.

Br Dent J. 2014 Jan;216(2):E4. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2014.36.

PMID:
24457893
18.

Summary of: dental composite materials and renal function in children.

McGinley EL.

Br Dent J. 2014 Jan;216(2):80-1. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2014.17.

PMID:
24457873
19.

New science challenges old notion that mercury dental amalgam is safe.

Homme KG, Kern JK, Haley BE, Geier DA, King PG, Sykes LK, Geier MR.

Biometals. 2014 Feb;27(1):19-24. doi: 10.1007/s10534-013-9700-9. Epub 2014 Jan 14. Review.

20.

Critical appraisal: dental amalgam update--part II: biological effects.

Wahl MJ, Swift EJ Jr.

J Esthet Restor Dent. 2013 Dec;25(6):433-7. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12075. Epub 2013 Oct 29.

PMID:
24320063
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk