Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 429

1.

The use of systematic reviews when designing studies.

Cooper NJ, Jones DR, Sutton AJ.

Clin Trials. 2005;2(3):260-4.

PMID:
16279149
2.

2009 updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Back Review Group.

Furlan AD, Pennick V, Bombardier C, van Tulder M; Editorial Board, Cochrane Back Review Group.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Aug 15;34(18):1929-41. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b1c99f.

PMID:
19680101
3.
6.

McMaster Premium LiteratUre Service (PLUS) performed well for identifying new studies for updated Cochrane reviews.

Hemens BJ, Haynes RB.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2012 Jan;65(1):62-72.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.02.010.

PMID:
21856121
7.

The quality of reports of critical care meta-analyses in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: an independent appraisal.

Delaney A, Bagshaw SM, Ferland A, Laupland K, Manns B, Doig C.

Crit Care Med. 2007 Feb;35(2):589-94.

PMID:
17205029
8.

Investing in updating: how do conclusions change when Cochrane systematic reviews are updated?

French SD, McDonald S, McKenzie JE, Green SE.

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005 Oct 14;5:33.

9.

Updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the cochrane collaboration back review group.

van Tulder M, Furlan A, Bombardier C, Bouter L; Editorial Board of the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Jun 15;28(12):1290-9.

PMID:
12811274
10.

Systematic reviewers commonly contact study authors but do so with limited rigor.

Mullan RJ, Flynn DN, Carlberg B, Tleyjeh IM, Kamath CC, LaBella ML, Erwin PJ, Guyatt GH, Montori VM.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Feb;62(2):138-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.08.002. Epub 2008 Nov 14. Review.

PMID:
19013767
11.

[The Cochrane Collaboration and systematic literature reviews about the efficiency of a treatment].

Aertgeerts B, Cools F.

Verh K Acad Geneeskd Belg. 2007;69(5-6):335-50. Review. Dutch.

PMID:
18351212
12.
13.

Cochrane reviews used more rigorous methods than non-Cochrane reviews: survey of systematic reviews in physiotherapy.

Moseley AM, Elkins MR, Herbert RD, Maher CG, Sherrington C.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Oct;62(10):1021-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.09.018. Epub 2009 Mar 17. Review.

PMID:
19282144
14.

Reporting of adverse events in systematic reviews can be improved: survey results.

Hopewell S, Wolfenden L, Clarke M.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Jun;61(6):597-602. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.10.005. Epub 2008 Apr 14.

PMID:
18411039
15.

Quality of systematic reviews in pediatric oncology--a systematic review.

Lundh A, Knijnenburg SL, Jørgensen AW, van Dalen EC, Kremer LC.

Cancer Treat Rev. 2009 Dec;35(8):645-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2009.08.010. Review.

PMID:
19836897
16.

An analysis of systematic reviews indicated low incorpororation of results from clinical trial quality assessment.

de Craen AJ, van Vliet HA, Helmerhorst FM.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 Mar;58(3):311-3.

PMID:
15718121
17.

Statistical heterogeneity in systematic reviews of clinical trials: a critical appraisal of guidelines and practice.

Higgins J, Thompson S, Deeks J, Altman D.

J Health Serv Res Policy. 2002 Jan;7(1):51-61. Review.

PMID:
11822262
18.

Searching for unpublished trials in Cochrane reviews may not be worth the effort.

van Driel ML, De Sutter A, De Maeseneer J, Christiaens T.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Aug;62(8):838-844.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.09.010. Epub 2009 Jan 6.

PMID:
19128939
19.

How to write a Cochrane systematic review.

Henderson LK, Craig JC, Willis NS, Tovey D, Webster AC.

Nephrology (Carlton). 2010 Sep;15(6):617-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1797.2010.01380.x.

PMID:
20883282
20.

The typical Cochrane review. How many trials? How many participants?

Mallett S, Clarke M.

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2002 Fall;18(4):820-3.

PMID:
12602082
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk