Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 149

1.

A priori postulated and real power in cluster randomized trials: mind the gap.

Guittet L, Giraudeau B, Ravaud P.

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005 Aug 18;5:25.

2.
3.
4.

Calculating sample sizes for cluster randomized trials: we can keep it simple and efficient!

van Breukelen GJ, Candel MJ.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2012 Nov;65(11):1212-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.06.002.

5.
6.

Comparison of methods for estimating the intraclass correlation coefficient for binary responses in cancer prevention cluster randomized trials.

Wu S, Crespi CM, Wong WK.

Contemp Clin Trials. 2012 Sep;33(5):869-80. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2012.05.004. Epub 2012 May 22.

8.

Patterns of intra-cluster correlation from primary care research to inform study design and analysis.

Adams G, Gulliford MC, Ukoumunne OC, Eldridge S, Chinn S, Campbell MJ.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2004 Aug;57(8):785-94. Review.

PMID:
15485730
9.

Changing cluster composition in cluster randomised controlled trials: design and analysis considerations.

Corrigan N, Bankart MJ, Gray LJ, Smith KL.

Trials. 2014 May 24;15:184. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-184.

10.

Allowing for imprecision of the intracluster correlation coefficient in the design of cluster randomized trials.

Turner RM, Prevost AT, Thompson SG.

Stat Med. 2004 Apr 30;23(8):1195-214.

PMID:
15083478
11.

Randomizing patients by family practice: sample size estimation, intracluster correlation and data analysis.

Cosby RH, Howard M, Kaczorowski J, Willan AR, Sellors JW.

Fam Pract. 2003 Feb;20(1):77-82.

12.

Clustering in surgical trials--database of intracluster correlations.

Cook JA, Bruckner T, MacLennan GS, Seiler CM.

Trials. 2012 Jan 4;13:2. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-2.

14.

Dichotomizing a continuous outcome in cluster randomized trials: impact on power.

Caille A, Leyrat C, Giraudeau B.

Stat Med. 2012 Oct 30;31(24):2822-32. doi: 10.1002/sim.5409. Epub 2012 Jun 26.

PMID:
22733454
15.

Intracluster correlation adjustments to maintain power in cluster trials for binary outcomes.

Chakraborty H, Moore J, Hartwell TD.

Contemp Clin Trials. 2009 Sep;30(5):473-80. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2009.04.005. Epub 2009 Apr 20.

PMID:
19386285
17.
18.
19.

A new dependence parameter approach to improve the design of cluster randomized trials with binary outcomes.

Crespi CM, Wong WK, Wu S.

Clin Trials. 2011 Dec;8(6):687-98. doi: 10.1177/1740774511423851. Epub 2011 Nov 2.

20.

Adjusted intraclass correlation coefficients for binary data: methods and estimates from a cluster-randomized trial in primary care.

Yelland LN, Salter AB, Ryan P, Laurence CO.

Clin Trials. 2011 Feb;8(1):48-58. doi: 10.1177/1740774510392256.

PMID:
21335589
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk