Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 103

1.

Why most published research findings are false.

Ioannidis JP.

PLoS Med. 2005 Aug;2(8):e124. Epub 2005 Aug 30.

PMID:
16060722
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
2.

Subgroup analyses in randomised controlled trials: quantifying the risks of false-positives and false-negatives.

Brookes ST, Whitley E, Peters TJ, Mulheran PA, Egger M, Davey Smith G.

Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(33):1-56. Review.

PMID:
11701102
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
3.

Estimating a summarized odds ratio whilst eliminating publication bias in meta-analysis.

Sugita M, Kanamori M, Izuno T, Miyakawa M.

Jpn J Clin Oncol. 1992 Oct;22(5):354-8.

PMID:
1469797
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
4.

Effect of formal statistical significance on the credibility of observational associations.

Ioannidis JP.

Am J Epidemiol. 2008 Aug 15;168(4):374-83; discussion 384-90. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwn156. Epub 2008 Jul 8. Review.

PMID:
18611956
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
5.

Concepts in sample size determination.

Rao UK.

Indian J Dent Res. 2012 Sep-Oct;23(5):660-4. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.107385. Review.

PMID:
23422614
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
6.

Power dressing and meta-analysis: incorporating power analysis into meta-analysis.

Muncer S, Taylor S, Craigie M.

J Adv Nurs. 2002 May;38(3):274-80. Review.

PMID:
11972663
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
7.

Hypothesis tests for population heterogeneity in meta-analysis.

Viechtbauer W.

Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2007 May;60(Pt 1):29-60.

PMID:
17535578
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
8.

Power of mental health nursing research: a statistical analysis of studies in the International Journal of Mental Health Nursing.

Gaskin CJ, Happell B.

Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2013 Feb;22(1):69-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0349.2012.00845.x. Epub 2012 Jun 27.

PMID:
22738423
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
9.

Power and sample size when multiple endpoints are considered.

Senn S, Bretz F.

Pharm Stat. 2007 Jul-Sep;6(3):161-70.

PMID:
17674404
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
10.

Publication bias in clinical research.

Easterbrook PJ, Berlin JA, Gopalan R, Matthews DR.

Lancet. 1991 Apr 13;337(8746):867-72.

PMID:
1672966
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
11.

Why selective publication of statistically significant results can be effective.

de Winter J, Happee R.

PLoS One. 2013 Jun 20;8(6):e66463. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066463. Print 2013.

PMID:
23840479
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
12.

Sample size in psychological research over the past 30 years.

Marszalek JM, Barber C, Kohlhart J, Holmes CB.

Percept Mot Skills. 2011 Apr;112(2):331-48.

PMID:
21667745
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
13.

Graphical methods for detecting bias in meta-analysis.

Ferrer RL.

Fam Med. 1998 Sep;30(8):579-83.

PMID:
9773289
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
14.

Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.

Burns T, Knapp M, Catty J, Healey A, Henderson J, Watt H, Wright C.

Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. Review.

PMID:
11532236
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article
15.

Statistical and clinical significance: alternative methods for understanding the importance of research findings.

Glaros AG.

J Ir Dent Assoc. 2004 Fall;50(3):128-31.

PMID:
15481525
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
16.

Assessment of the Gould-Shih procedure for sample size re-estimation.

Waksman JA.

Pharm Stat. 2007 Jan-Mar;6(1):53-65.

PMID:
17133631
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
17.

Publication bias in the anesthesiology literature.

De Oliveira GS Jr, Chang R, Kendall MC, Fitzgerald PC, McCarthy RJ.

Anesth Analg. 2012 May;114(5):1042-8. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182468fc6. Epub 2012 Feb 17.

PMID:
22344237
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
18.

Interpretation of tests of heterogeneity and bias in meta-analysis.

Ioannidis JP.

J Eval Clin Pract. 2008 Oct;14(5):951-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.00986.x. Review.

PMID:
19018930
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
19.

Sample size and power.

Whitney JD.

J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 1999 Nov;26(6):314. No abstract available.

PMID:
10865617
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
20.

Estimating the proportion of studies missing for meta-analysis due to publication bias.

Formann AK.

Contemp Clin Trials. 2008 Sep;29(5):732-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2008.05.004. Epub 2008 May 19.

PMID:
18586577
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk