Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 439

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 15327447)

1.

Randomized controlled trial of glove perforation in single- and double-gloving in episiotomy repair after vaginal delivery.

Punyatanasakchai P, Chittacharoen A, Ayudhya NI.

J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2004 Oct;30(5):354-7.

PMID:
15327447
2.
3.

Randomised controlled trial of glove perforation in single and double-gloving methods in gynaecologic surgery.

Kovavisarach E, Seedadee C.

Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002 Nov;42(5):519-21.

PMID:
12495099
4.

Is double-gloving really protective? A comparison between the glove perforation rate among perioperative nurses with single and double gloves during surgery.

Guo YP, Wong PM, Li Y, Or PP.

Am J Surg. 2012 Aug;204(2):210-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.08.017. Epub 2012 Feb 17.

PMID:
22342011
5.

Prospective randomized assessment of single versus double-gloving for general surgical procedures.

Na'aya HU, Madziga AG, Eni UE.

Niger J Med. 2009 Jan-Mar;18(1):73-4.

PMID:
19485153
6.

The effect of double gloving on frequency of glove perforations.

Bennett B, Duff P.

Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Dec;78(6):1019-22.

PMID:
1945200
7.
8.
9.

Prospective study of glove perforation in obstetrical and gynecological operations: are we safe enough?

Malhotra M, Sharma JB, Wadhwa L, Arora R.

J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2004 Aug;30(4):319-22.

PMID:
15238110
10.

[Glove perforation in surgery and protective effect of double gloves].

de Castro-Peraza ME, Garzón-Rodríguez E, Rodríguez-Pérez V, Sosa-Alvarez I, Gutierrez-Hernández J, Asiain-Ugarte C.

Enferm Clin. 2010 Mar-Apr;20(2):73-9. doi: 10.1016/j.enfcli.2009.10.002. Epub 2010 Jan 29. Spanish.

PMID:
20116312
11.

Frequency of glove perforation and the protective effect of double gloves in gynecological surgery.

Murta EF, Silva CS, Júnior OR.

Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2003 Jun;268(2):82-4. Epub 2002 Aug 28.

PMID:
12768294
12.

Single versus double-gloving for obstetric and gynecologic procedures.

Lancaster C, Duff P.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 May;196(5):e36-7.

PMID:
17466674
13.
14.

Perforation in single- and double-gloving methods for cesarean section.

Kovavisarach E, Vanitchanon P.

Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1999 Dec;67(3):157-61.

PMID:
10659898
15.

Glove perforation rate in open lung surgery.

Hollaus PH, Lax F, Janakiev D, Wurnig PN, Pridun NS.

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1999 Apr;15(4):461-4.

PMID:
10371122
16.

Efficacy of double versus single gloving in protecting the operating team.

Gani JS, Anseline PF, Bissett RL.

Aust N Z J Surg. 1990 Mar;60(3):171-5.

PMID:
2327922
17.

A prospective study of the efficacy of various gloving techniques in the application of Erich arch bars.

Pieper SP, Schimmele SR, Johnson JA, Harper JL.

J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1995 Oct;53(10):1174-6; discussion 1177.

PMID:
7562171
18.

Outer gloves in orthopaedic procedures: a polyester/stainless steel wire weave glove liner compared with latex.

Louis SS, Steinberg EL, Gruen OA, Bartlett CS, Helfet DL.

J Orthop Trauma. 1998 Feb;12(2):101-5.

PMID:
9503298
19.

Double gloving to reduce surgical cross-infection.

Tanner J, Parkinson H.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;(3):CD003087. Review. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;(3):CD003087.

PMID:
12137673
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk