Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 298

Related Citations for PubMed (Select 15135674)

1.

Useful benchmarks to evaluate outcomes after esophagectomy and pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Traverso LW, Shinchi H, Low DE.

Am J Surg. 2004 May;187(5):604-8.

PMID:
15135674
2.

Effect of hospital volume, surgeon experience, and surgeon volume on patient outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single-institution experience.

Schmidt CM, Turrini O, Parikh P, House MG, Zyromski NJ, Nakeeb A, Howard TJ, Pitt HA, Lillemoe KD.

Arch Surg. 2010 Jul;145(7):634-40. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2010.118.

PMID:
20644125
3.
4.
5.

Measure what matters: institutional outcome data are superior to the use of surrogate markers to define "center of excellence" for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

Goshima KR, Mills JL Sr, Awari K, Pike SL, Hughes JD.

Ann Vasc Surg. 2008 May-Jun;22(3):328-34. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2007.09.013. Epub 2008 Apr 14.

PMID:
18411029
6.

Feasibility of pancreaticoduodenectomy in a nonuniversity tertiary care center: what are the key elements of success?

Khithani A, Christian D, Lowe K, Saad AJ, Linder JD, Tarnasky P, Jeyarajah DR.

Am Surg. 2011 May;77(5):545-51.

PMID:
21679585
7.

Surgeon volume as an indicator of outcomes after carotid endarterectomy: an effect independent of specialty practice and hospital volume.

Cowan JA Jr, Dimick JB, Thompson BG, Stanley JC, Upchurch GR Jr.

J Am Coll Surg. 2002 Dec;195(6):814-21.

PMID:
12495314
8.

The learning curve in pancreatic surgery.

Tseng JF, Pisters PW, Lee JE, Wang H, Gomez HF, Sun CC, Evans DB.

Surgery. 2007 May;141(5):694-701.

PMID:
17511115
9.

The learning curve in pancreatic surgery.

Tseng JF, Pisters PW, Lee JE, Wang H, Gomez HF, Sun CC, Evans DB.

Surgery. 2007 Apr;141(4):456-63. Epub 2007 Jan 22. Corrected and republished in: Surgery. 2007 May;141(5):694-701.

PMID:
17383522
10.

Should esophagectomy be performed in a low-volume center?

Padmanabhan RS, Byrnes MC, Helmer SD, Smith RS.

Am Surg. 2002 Apr;68(4):348-51; discussion 351-2.

PMID:
11952245
11.

The hospital volume-outcome relationship in general thoracic surgery. Is the surgeon the critical determinant?

Urschel JD, Urschel DM.

J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2000 Feb;41(1):153-5.

PMID:
10836244
12.

A change in clinical practice: a partially stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis reduces morbidity and improves functional outcome after esophagectomy for cancer.

Kondra J, Ong SR, Clifton J, Evans K, Finley RJ, Yee J.

Dis Esophagus. 2008;21(5):422-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2007.00792.x.

PMID:
19125796
13.

Negligible effect of selective preoperative biliary drainage on perioperative resuscitation, morbidity, and mortality in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Coates JM, Beal SH, Russo JE, Vanderveen KA, Chen SL, Bold RJ, Canter RJ.

Arch Surg. 2009 Sep;144(9):841-7. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2009.152.

PMID:
19797109
14.

Minimally invasive esophagectomy: early experience and outcomes.

Senkowski CK, Adams MT, Beck AN, Brower ST.

Am Surg. 2006 Aug;72(8):677-83; discussion 683.

PMID:
16913309
15.

Outcomes of complex gastrointestinal procedures performed in a community hospital.

Guzzo MH, Landercasper J, Boyd WC, Lambert PJ.

WMJ. 2005 Aug;104(6):30-4.

16.

Major pancreatic resections for suspected cancer in a community-based teaching hospital: lessons learned.

Metreveli RE, Sahm K, Abdel-Misih R, Petrelli NJ.

J Surg Oncol. 2007 Mar 1;95(3):201-6.

PMID:
17323334
17.

Additional organ resection combined with pancreaticoduodenectomy does not increase postoperative morbidity and mortality.

Nikfarjam M, Sehmbey M, Kimchi ET, Gusani NJ, Shereef S, Avella DM, Staveley-O'Carroll KF.

J Gastrointest Surg. 2009 May;13(5):915-21. doi: 10.1007/s11605-009-0801-2. Epub 2009 Feb 7.

PMID:
19198960
18.
19.

Perioperative outcomes after transition from conventional to minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy in a specialized center.

Hamouda AH, Forshaw MJ, Tsigritis K, Jones GE, Noorani AS, Rohatgi A, Botha AJ.

Surg Endosc. 2010 Apr;24(4):865-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0679-9.

PMID:
19730947
20.

Open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy: trends of utilization and associated outcomes in England.

Lazzarino AI, Nagpal K, Bottle A, Faiz O, Moorthy K, Aylin P.

Ann Surg. 2010 Aug;252(2):292-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181dd4e8c.

PMID:
20622666
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk