Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 156

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 14530225)

1.

Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: a meta-analysis of test performance in suspected biliary disease.

Romagnuolo J, Bardou M, Rahme E, Joseph L, Reinhold C, Barkun AN.

Ann Intern Med. 2003 Oct 7;139(7):547-57.

PMID:
14530225
2.

Diagnostic role of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in evaluation of obstructive biliopathies and correlating it with final diagnosis and clinical profile of patients.

Parashari UC, Khanduri S, Bhadury S, Upadhyay D, Kishore K.

J Nat Sci Biol Med. 2015 Jan-Jun;6(1):131-8. doi: 10.4103/0976-9668.149110.

3.

Diagnostic value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in choledocholithiasis.

Chen W, Mo JJ, Lin L, Li CQ, Zhang JF.

World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Mar 21;21(11):3351-60. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i11.3351.

4.

Differentiation of noncalculous periampullary obstruction: comparison of CT with negative-contrast CT cholangiopancreatography versus MRI with MR cholangiopancreatography.

Li B, Zhang L, Zhang ZY, Ni JM, Lu FQ, Wu WJ, Jiang CJ.

Eur Radiol. 2015 Feb;25(2):391-401. doi: 10.1007/s00330-014-3430-4. Epub 2014 Sep 24.

PMID:
25249314
5.

Diagnostics of biliary dilatation by means of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography.

Szalacha-Tarała E, Ramotowski R, Guz W, Samojedny A, Dziurzyńska-Białek E, Jadczak P.

Pol J Radiol. 2014 Sep 16;79:315-22. doi: 10.12659/PJR.890537. eCollection 2014.

6.

Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of pancreas divisum: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Rustagi T, Njei B.

Pancreas. 2014 Aug;43(6):823-8. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000000143. Review.

PMID:
24743381
7.

Magnetic resonance cholangiography in assessing biliary anatomy in living donors: a meta-analysis.

Xu YB, Bai YL, Min ZG, Qin SY.

World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Dec 7;19(45):8427-34. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i45.8427. Review.

8.

Diagnostic value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for biliary complications in orthotopic liver transplantation: a meta-analysis.

Xu YB, Min ZG, Jiang HX, Qin SY, Hu BL.

Transplant Proc. 2013 Jul-Aug;45(6):2341-6. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.03.031. Review.

PMID:
23953547
9.

Diagnostic value of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of the biliary obstruction.

Bilgin M, Toprak H, Burgazli M, Bilgin SS, Chasan R, Erdogan A, Balcı C.

ScientificWorldJournal. 2012;2012:731089. doi: 10.1100/2012/731089. Epub 2012 Mar 12.

10.

Unusual cause of biliary obstruction: hepatobiliary fascioliasis.

Onur MR, Ciçekçi M, Kocakoç E, Poyraz AK.

Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 2011 Mar;74(1):97-8. No abstract available.

PMID:
21563663
11.

Is MRCP equivalent to ERCP for diagnosing biliary obstruction in orthotopic liver transplant recipients? A meta-analysis.

Jorgensen JE, Waljee AK, Volk ML, Sonnenday CJ, Elta GH, Al-Hawary MM, Singal AG, Taylor JR, Elmunzer BJ.

Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 May;73(5):955-62. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.12.014. Epub 2011 Feb 12. Review.

PMID:
21316670
12.

How appropriate is the gold standard for diagnosis of airway obstruction?

Aggarwal AN.

Lung India. 2008 Oct;25(4):139-41. doi: 10.4103/0970-2113.45276. No abstract available.

13.

Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography image enhancement for automatic disease detection.

Logeswaran R.

World J Radiol. 2010 Jul 28;2(7):269-79. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v2.i7.269.

14.

Primary sclerosing cholangitis: meta-analysis of diagnostic performance of MR cholangiopancreatography.

Dave M, Elmunzer BJ, Dwamena BA, Higgins PD.

Radiology. 2010 Aug;256(2):387-96. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10091953.

PMID:
20656832
15.

Bayesian Adaptation of the Summary ROC Curve Method for Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Performance.

Miller SW, Sinha D, Slate EH, Garrow D, Romagnuolo J.

J Data Sci. 2009 Jul 1;7(3):349-364.

16.

MR cholangiopancreatography at 3.0 T: intraindividual comparative study with MR cholangiopancreatography at 1.5 T for clinical patients.

Onishi H, Kim T, Hori M, Murakami T, Tatsumi M, Nakaya Y, Nakamoto A, Osuga K, Tomoda K, Nakamura H.

Invest Radiol. 2009 Sep;44(9):559-65. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181b4c0ae.

PMID:
19692840
17.

Single-step treatment of gall bladder and bile duct stones: a combined endoscopic-laparoscopic technique.

Ghazal AH, Sorour MA, El-Riwini M, El-Bahrawy H.

Int J Surg. 2009 Aug;7(4):338-46. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2009.05.005. Epub 2009 May 27.

18.

Another dimension in magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: comparison of 2- and 3-dimensional magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the evaluation of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas.

Yoon LS, Catalano OA, Fritz S, Ferrone CR, Hahn PF, Sahani DV.

J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2009 May-Jun;33(3):363-8. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e3181852193.

PMID:
19478628
19.

Comparative diagnostic evaluation with MR cholangiopancreatography, ultrasonography and CT in patients with pancreatobiliary disease.

Maurea S, Caleo O, Mollica C, Imbriaco M, Mainenti PP, Palumbo C, Mancini M, Camera L, Salvatore M.

Radiol Med. 2009 Apr;114(3):390-402. doi: 10.1007/s11547-009-0374-x. Epub 2009 Mar 5. English, Italian.

PMID:
19266258
20.

The diameter of common bile duct does not predict the cause of extrahepatic cholestasis.

Karvonen J, Kairisto V, Grönroos JM.

Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2009 Feb;19(1):25-8. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31818a6685.

PMID:
19238062
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk