Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 3894

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 12965983)

1.

Evaluation of abnormal mammography results and palpable breast abnormalities.

Kerlikowske K, Smith-Bindman R, Ljung BM, Grady D.

Ann Intern Med. 2003 Aug 19;139(4):274-84. Review.

PMID:
12965983
2.

Interventional breast procedures.

de Paredes ES, Langer TG, Cousins J.

Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 1998 Sep-Oct;27(5):133-84. Review.

PMID:
9794095
3.

Stereotactic and sonographic large-core biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: results of the Radiologic Diagnostic Oncology Group V study.

Fajardo LL, Pisano ED, Caudry DJ, Gatsonis CA, Berg WA, Connolly J, Schnitt S, Page DL, McNeil BJ; Radiologist Investigators of the Radiologic Diagnostic Oncology Group V.

Acad Radiol. 2004 Mar;11(3):293-308.

PMID:
15035520
5.

Fine-needle aspiration of clinically suspicious palpable breast masses with histopathologic correlation.

Ariga R, Bloom K, Reddy VB, Kluskens L, Francescatti D, Dowlat K, Siziopikou P, Gattuso P.

Am J Surg. 2002 Nov;184(5):410-3.

PMID:
12433603
6.

Use of fine needle aspiration for solid breast lesions is accurate and cost-effective.

Rubin M, Horiuchi K, Joy N, Haun W, Read R, Ratzer E, Fenoglio M.

Am J Surg. 1997 Dec;174(6):694-6; discussion 697-8.

PMID:
9409599
7.

Breast fine needle aspiration cytology. Utility as a screening tool for clinically palpable lesions.

Costa MJ, Tadros T, Hilton G, Birdsong G.

Acta Cytol. 1993 Jul-Aug;37(4):461-71.

PMID:
8328240
8.

Solid nonpalpable breast lesions. Success and failure of guided fine-needle aspiration cytology in a consecutive series of 2444 cases.

Ciatto S, Rosselli Del Turco M, Ambrogetti D, Bravetti P, Catarzi S, Morrone D, Cariaggi MP.

Acta Radiol. 1997 Sep;38(5):815-20.

PMID:
9332236
9.

Palpable breast masses with probably benign morphology at sonography: can biopsy be deferred?

Park YM, Kim EK, Lee JH, Ryu JH, Han SS, Choi SJ, Lee SJ, Yoon HK.

Acta Radiol. 2008 Dec;49(10):1104-11. doi: 10.1080/02841850802438504.

PMID:
18855166
10.

Accuracy of mammographic appearances after breast fine-needle aspiration.

Hindle WH, Chen EC.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Jun;176(6):1286-90; discussion 1290-2.

PMID:
9215186
12.

Clinical management of nonpalpable or small breast masses by fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) under ultrasound guidance.

Okamoto H, Ogawara T, Inoue S, Kobayashi K, Sekikawa T, Matsumoto Y.

J Surg Oncol. 1998 Apr;67(4):246-50.

PMID:
9579372
14.

[Ultrasound follow-up of palpable solid, probably benign breast lesions (BI-RADS category III)].

Graf O, Helbich TH, Fuchsjäger MH, Hopf G, Morgun M, Graf C, Mallek R.

Rofo. 2004 Sep;176(9):1251-6. German.

PMID:
15346259
15.

Costs and effects of ultrasonography in the evaluation of palpable breast masses.

Flobbe K, Kessels AG, Severens JL, Beets GL, de Koning HJ, von Meyenfeld MF, van Engelshoven JM.

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2004 Fall;20(4):440-8.

PMID:
15609793
16.

Systematic review: using magnetic resonance imaging to screen women at high risk for breast cancer.

Warner E, Messersmith H, Causer P, Eisen A, Shumak R, Plewes D.

Ann Intern Med. 2008 May 6;148(9):671-9. Review.

PMID:
18458280
17.
18.

Evaluation of palpable breast masses.

Klein S.

Am Fam Physician. 2005 May 1;71(9):1731-8. Review. Erratum in: Am Fam Physician. 2005 Sep 1;72(5):761.

20.

[Analysis of the results of 137 subclinical breast lesions excisions. Value of ultrasonography in the early diagnosis of breast cancer].

Jacob D, Brombart JC, Muller C, Lefèbvre C, Massa F, Depoerck A.

J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 1997;26(1):27-31. French.

PMID:
9091540
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk