Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 769

Related Citations for PubMed (Select 12887468)

1.

A prospective comparison of radical retropubic and robot-assisted prostatectomy: experience in one institution.

Tewari A, Srivasatava A, Menon M; Members of the VIP Team.

BJU Int. 2003 Aug;92(3):205-10.

PMID:
12887468
2.
3.

Radical prostatectomy for prostatic adenocarcinoma: a matched comparison of open retropubic and robot-assisted techniques.

Krambeck AE, DiMarco DS, Rangel LJ, Bergstralh EJ, Myers RP, Blute ML, Gettman MT.

BJU Int. 2009 Feb;103(4):448-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08012.x. Epub 2008 Sep 3.

PMID:
18778350
4.

Robotic vs open prostatectomy in a laparoscopically naive centre: a matched-pair analysis.

Rocco B, Matei DV, Melegari S, Ospina JC, Mazzoleni F, Errico G, Mastropasqua M, Santoro L, Detti S, de Cobelli O.

BJU Int. 2009 Oct;104(7):991-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08532.x. Epub 2009 May 5.

PMID:
19426191
5.

A retrospective comparison of anesthetic management of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy.

D'Alonzo RC, Gan TJ, Moul JW, Albala DM, Polascik TJ, Robertson CN, Sun L, Dahm P, Habib AS.

J Clin Anesth. 2009 Aug;21(5):322-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2008.09.005. Epub 2009 Aug 22.

PMID:
19700296
6.

[Vattikuti institute prostatectomy (VIP) and current results].

Bhandari M, Menon M.

Arch Esp Urol. 2007 May;60(4):397-407. Spanish.

PMID:
17626532
7.

Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies.

Ficarra V, Novara G, Artibani W, Cestari A, Galfano A, Graefen M, Guazzoni G, Guillonneau B, Menon M, Montorsi F, Patel V, Rassweiler J, Van Poppel H.

Eur Urol. 2009 May;55(5):1037-63. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.01.036. Epub 2009 Jan 25. Review.

PMID:
19185977
8.

Should experienced open prostatic surgeons convert to robotic surgery? The real learning curve for one surgeon over 3 years.

Doumerc N, Yuen C, Savdie R, Rahman MB, Rasiah KK, Pe Benito R, Delprado W, Matthews J, Haynes AM, Stricker PD.

BJU Int. 2010 Aug;106(3):378-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.09158.x. Epub 2010 Jan 8.

PMID:
20067454
9.
10.

Factors determining functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy: robot-assisted versus retropubic.

Kim SC, Song C, Kim W, Kang T, Park J, Jeong IG, Lee S, Cho YM, Ahn H.

Eur Urol. 2011 Sep;60(3):413-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.05.011. Epub 2011 May 17.

PMID:
21612859
11.

[Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus robotic].

Cáceres F, Sánchez C, Martínez-Piñeiro L, Tabernero A, Alonso S, Cisneros J, Cabrera Castillo PM, Alvarez Maestro M, Martín Hernández M, Pérez-Utrilla Pérez M, de la Peña JJ.

Arch Esp Urol. 2007 May;60(4):430-8. Review. Spanish.

PMID:
17626535
12.

Comparison of length of hospital stay between radical retropubic prostatectomy and robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.

Nelson B, Kaufman M, Broughton G, Cookson MS, Chang SS, Herrell SD, Baumgartner RG, Smith JA Jr.

J Urol. 2007 Mar;177(3):929-31.

PMID:
17296378
13.

Comparison of robotic-assisted versus retropubic radical prostatectomy performed by a single surgeon.

Ou YC, Yang CR, Wang J, Cheng CL, Patel VR.

Anticancer Res. 2009 May;29(5):1637-42.

14.

Is robotically assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy less invasive than retropubic radical prostatectomy? Results from a prospective, unrandomized, comparative study.

Fracalanza S, Ficarra V, Cavalleri S, Galfano A, Novara G, Mangano A, Plebani M, Artibani W.

BJU Int. 2008 May;101(9):1145-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07513.x.

PMID:
18399830
15.

Open radical retropubic prostatectomy gives favourable surgical and functional outcomes after transurethral resection of the prostate.

Palisaar JR, Wenske S, Sommerer F, Hinkel A, Noldus J.

BJU Int. 2009 Sep;104(5):611-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08474.x. Epub 2009 Mar 4.

PMID:
19298408
17.

A randomized clinical trial of suspension technique for improving early recovery of urinary continence after radical retropubic prostatectomy.

Noguchi M, Kakuma T, Suekane S, Nakashima O, Mohamed ER, Matsuoka K.

BJU Int. 2008 Sep;102(8):958-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07759.x. Epub 2008 May 15.

PMID:
18485031
18.

Bilateral nerve sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy is associated with faster continence recovery but not with erectile function recovery compared with retropubic open prostatectomy: the need for accurate selection of patients.

Ludovico GM, Dachille G, Pagliarulo G, D'Elia C, Mondaini N, Gacci M, Detti B, Malossini G, Bartoletti R, Cai T.

Oncol Rep. 2013 Jun;29(6):2445-50. doi: 10.3892/or.2013.2365. Epub 2013 Mar 26.

PMID:
23545628
19.

Comparison of prostate-specific antigen recurrence-free survival in a contemporary cohort of patients undergoing either radical retropubic or robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Schroeck FR, Sun L, Freedland SJ, Albala DM, Mouraviev V, Polascik TJ, Moul JW.

BJU Int. 2008 Jul;102(1):28-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07607.x. Epub 2008 Apr 2.

PMID:
18384634
20.

A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.

Smith JA Jr, Chan RC, Chang SS, Herrell SD, Clark PE, Baumgartner R, Cookson MS.

J Urol. 2007 Dec;178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. Epub 2007 Oct 22.

PMID:
17936849
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk