Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 105

2.

Indirect comparisons of competing interventions.

Glenny AM, Altman DG, Song F, Sakarovitch C, Deeks JJ, D'Amico R, Bradburn M, Eastwood AJ; International Stroke Trial Collaborative Group.

Health Technol Assess. 2005 Jul;9(26):1-134, iii-iv.

3.

Inconsistency between direct and indirect comparisons of competing interventions: meta-epidemiological study.

Song F, Xiong T, Parekh-Bhurke S, Loke YK, Sutton AJ, Eastwood AJ, Holland R, Chen YF, Glenny AM, Deeks JJ, Altman DG.

BMJ. 2011 Aug 16;343:d4909. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d4909.

4.

Indirect comparisons of therapeutic interventions.

Schöttker B, Lühmann D, Boulkhemair D, Raspe H.

GMS Health Technol Assess. 2009 Jul 21;5:Doc09. doi: 10.3205/hta000071.

5.

Incorporating multiple interventions in meta-analysis: an evaluation of the mixed treatment comparison with the adjusted indirect comparison.

O'Regan C, Ghement I, Eyawo O, Guyatt GH, Mills EJ.

Trials. 2009 Sep 21;10:86. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-10-86.

6.

Indirect comparisons: a review of reporting and methodological quality.

Donegan S, Williamson P, Gamble C, Tudur-Smith C.

PLoS One. 2010 Nov 10;5(11):e11054. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011054. Review.

7.

Adjusted indirect comparison may be less biased than direct comparison for evaluating new pharmaceutical interventions.

Song F, Harvey I, Lilford R.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 May;61(5):455-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.06.006. Epub 2007 Nov 28. Review.

PMID:
18394538
8.

Indirect comparisons of treatments based on systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials.

Edwards SJ, Clarke MJ, Wordsworth S, Borrill J.

Int J Clin Pract. 2009 Jun;63(6):841-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2009.02072.x. Review.

PMID:
19490195
9.

Interpreting indirect treatment comparisons and network meta-analysis for health-care decision making: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: part 1.

Jansen JP, Fleurence R, Devine B, Itzler R, Barrett A, Hawkins N, Lee K, Boersma C, Annemans L, Cappelleri JC.

Value Health. 2011 Jun;14(4):417-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.04.002.

10.

Methodological problems in the use of indirect comparisons for evaluating healthcare interventions: survey of published systematic reviews.

Song F, Loke YK, Walsh T, Glenny AM, Eastwood AJ, Altman DG.

BMJ. 2009 Apr 3;338:b1147. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b1147. Review.

11.

Reporting of results from network meta-analyses: methodological systematic review.

Bafeta A, Trinquart L, Seror R, Ravaud P.

BMJ. 2014 Mar 11;348:g1741. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g1741. Review.

12.

Indirect comparison in evaluating relative efficacy illustrated by antimicrobial prophylaxis in colorectal surgery.

Song F, Glenny AM, Altman DG.

Control Clin Trials. 2000 Oct;21(5):488-97.

PMID:
11018565
13.

Direct versus indirect comparisons: a summary of the evidence.

Gartlehner G, Moore CG.

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2008 Spring;24(2):170-7. doi: 10.1017/S0266462308080240. Review.

PMID:
18400120
14.

Frequency of treatment-effect modification affecting indirect comparisons: a systematic review.

Coory M, Jordan S.

Pharmacoeconomics. 2010;28(9):723-32. doi: 10.2165/11535670-000000000-00000. Review.

PMID:
20545383
15.

A systematic review of comparisons of effect sizes derived from randomised and non-randomised studies.

MacLehose RR, Reeves BC, Harvey IM, Sheldon TA, Russell IT, Black AM.

Health Technol Assess. 2000;4(34):1-154. Review.

16.

Effectiveness of interventions that assist caregivers to support people with dementia living in the community: a systematic review.

Parker D, Mills S, Abbey J.

Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008 Jun;6(2):137-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2008.00090.x.

PMID:
21631819
17.

Overall similarity and consistency assessment scores are not sufficiently accurate for predicting discrepancy between direct and indirect comparison estimates.

Xiong T, Parekh-Bhurke S, Loke YK, Abdelhamid A, Sutton AJ, Eastwood AJ, Holland R, Chen YF, Walsh T, Glenny AM, Song F.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Feb;66(2):184-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.06.022. Epub 2012 Nov 24. Review.

18.

Errors in the conduct of systematic reviews of pharmacological interventions for irritable bowel syndrome.

Ford AC, Guyatt GH, Talley NJ, Moayyedi P.

Am J Gastroenterol. 2010 Feb;105(2):280-8. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.658. Epub 2009 Nov 17. Review.

PMID:
19920807
19.

Conducting indirect-treatment-comparison and network-meta-analysis studies: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: part 2.

Hoaglin DC, Hawkins N, Jansen JP, Scott DA, Itzler R, Cappelleri JC, Boersma C, Thompson D, Larholt KM, Diaz M, Barrett A.

Value Health. 2011 Jun;14(4):429-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.01.011.

20.

Does Cryotherapy Improve Outcomes With Soft Tissue Injury?

Hubbard TJ, Denegar CR.

J Athl Train. 2004 Sep;39(3):278-279.

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk