Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 213

Similar articles for PubMed (Select 12576607)

1.

Opportunistic screening for genital chlamydial infection. I: acceptability of urine testing in primary and secondary healthcare settings.

Pimenta JM, Catchpole M, Rogers PA, Perkins E, Jackson N, Carlisle C, Randall S, Hopwood J, Hewitt G, Underhill G, Mallinson H, McLean L, Gleave T, Tobin J, Harindra V, Ghosh A.

Sex Transm Infect. 2003 Feb;79(1):16-21.

2.

Knowledge and acceptability of Chlamydia trachomatis screening among pregnant women and their partners; a cross-sectional study.

Pereboom MT, Spelten ER, Manniën J, Rours GI, Morré SA, Schellevis FG, Hutton EK.

BMC Public Health. 2014 Jul 9;14:704. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-704.

3.

Response letter to T Fowler and co-authors - estimating the positive predictive value of opportunistic population testing for gonorrhoea as part of the English Chlamydia Screening Programme.

Field N, Hughes G, Kennedy I, Ison C, Dunbar K, Charlett A.

Int J STD AIDS. 2014 May 8;25(9):692. [Epub ahead of print] No abstract available.

PMID:
24810212
4.

Staff views of an opportunistic chlamydia testing pilot in a primary health organisation.

McKernon S, Azariah S.

J Prim Health Care. 2013 Dec 1;5(4):283-9.

PMID:
24294616
5.

To develop and measure the effectiveness and acceptability of a pharmacy-based chlamydia screening intervention in Australia.

Gudka S, Marshall L, Creagh A, Clifford RM.

BMJ Open. 2013 Aug 17;3(8):e003338. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003338.

6.

The English National Chlamydia Screening Programme: where next?

Macintosh M, McKee M.

Public Health. 2013 Jul;127(7):681-3. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2013.04.007. Epub 2013 Jun 27. No abstract available.

PMID:
23809682
7.

Large increase in opportunistic testing for chlamydia during a pilot project in a primary health organisation.

Azariah S, McKernon S, Werder S.

J Prim Health Care. 2013 Jun 1;5(2):141-5.

PMID:
23748396
8.

Attitudes to Chlamydia screening elicited using the social networking site Facebook for subject recruitment.

Ahmed N, Jayasinghe Y, Wark JD, Fenner Y, Moore EE, Tabrizi SN, Fletcher A, Garland SM.

Sex Health. 2013 Jul;10(3):224-8. doi: 10.1071/SH12198.

PMID:
23702200
9.

Chlamydia screening interventions from community pharmacies: a systematic review.

Gudka S, Afuwape FE, Wong B, Yow XL, Anderson C, Clifford RM.

Sex Health. 2013 Jul;10(3):229-39. doi: 10.1071/SH12069. Review.

PMID:
23651619
10.

Chlamydia screening coverage estimates derived using healthcare effectiveness data and information system procedures and indirect estimation vary substantially.

Broad JM, Manhart LE, Kerani RP, Scholes D, Hughes JP, Golden MR.

Sex Transm Dis. 2013 Apr;40(4):292-7. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3182809776.

PMID:
23486493
11.

Chlamydia testing and retesting patterns at family planning clinics in Australia.

Bowring AL, Goller JL, Gouillou M, Harvey C, Bateson D, McNamee K, Read C, Boyle D, Jordan L, Wardle R, Stephens A, Donovan B, Guy R, Hellard M.

Sex Health. 2013 Mar;10(1):74-81. doi: 10.1071/SH11187.

PMID:
23256944
12.

Online chlamydia testing: an innovative approach that appeals to young people.

Kwan KS, Jachimowicz EA, Bastian L, Marshall L, Mak DB.

Med J Aust. 2012 Sep 3;197(5):287-90.

PMID:
22938127
13.

Could a peer-led intervention increase uptake of chlamydia screening? A proof of principle pilot study.

Loaring J, Hickman M, Oliver I, Campbell R, Trotter C, Macleod J, Pye K, Crichton J, Horner P.

J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2013 Jan;39(1):21-8. doi: 10.1136/jfprhc-2011-100151. Epub 2012 Aug 1.

PMID:
22855521
14.

Opportunistic adolescent health screening of surgical inpatients.

Wilson H, Bostock N, Phillip N, Shannon P, Payne D, Kennedy A.

Arch Dis Child. 2012 Oct;97(10):919-21. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2012-301835. Epub 2012 Jul 4.

PMID:
22764091
15.

A pragmatic assessment of the relative efficiency of outreach chlamydia screening events conducted in non-clinical settings.

Bowden FJ, Currie MJ, Todkill M, Schmidt M, Webeck S, Del Rosario R, Bavinton T, Tyson A.

BMC Public Health. 2012 May 9;12:341. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-341.

16.

Opportunistic evidence: evidence-based policy in the setting of the Australian Government's chlamydia screening pilot.

Crouch SR.

Aust Health Rev. 2012 Feb;36(1):57-60. doi: 10.1071/AH10942. Review.

PMID:
22513021
17.

Men's attitudes towards chlamydia screening: a narrative review.

Balfe M, Brugha R, O'Connell E, Vaughan D, O'Donovan D.

Sex Health. 2012 May;9(2):120-30. doi: 10.1071/SH10094. Review.

PMID:
22498155
18.

Chlamydia testing patterns for commercially insured women, 2008.

Tao G, Hoover KW, Kent CK.

Am J Prev Med. 2012 Apr;42(4):337-41. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.11.013.

PMID:
22424245
19.

Evaluation of a systematic postal screening and treatment service for genital Chlamydia trachomatis, with remote clinic access via the internet: a cross-sectional study, East of England.

Bracebridge S, Bachmann MO, Ramkhelawon K, Woolnough A.

Sex Transm Infect. 2012 Aug;88(5):375-81. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2011-050267. Epub 2012 Feb 28.

PMID:
22375045
20.

Exploring the feasibility of alternative STD-testing venues and results delivery channels for a national screening campaign.

Friedman AL, Bloodgood B.

Health Promot Pract. 2013 Jan;14(1):96-104. doi: 10.1177/1524839911404226. Epub 2011 Sep 30.

PMID:
21965593
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk