Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 146

1.

Breast augmentation with anatomical cohesive gel implants: the world's largest current experience.

Hedén P, Jernbeck J, Hober M.

Clin Plast Surg. 2001 Jul;28(3):531-52.

PMID:
11471959
2.

Clinical experience with a fourth-generation textured silicone gel breast implant: a review of 1012 Mentor MemoryGel breast implants.

Stevens WG, Pacella SJ, Gear AJ, Freeman ME, McWhorter C, Tenenbaum MJ, Stoker DA.

Aesthet Surg J. 2008 Nov-Dec;28(6):642-7. doi: 10.1016/j.asj.2008.09.008.

PMID:
19083592
3.

[The non-perfect results of breast implants].

Dionyssopoulos A.

Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2005 Oct;50(5):534-43. Epub 2005 Sep 27. French.

PMID:
16198042
4.

Breast augmentation with full-height anatomic saline implants: the pros and cons.

Tebbetts JB.

Clin Plast Surg. 2001 Jul;28(3):567-77.

PMID:
11471962
5.

[Round and anatomical mammary implants. Respective advantages and disadvantages].

Auclair E, Staub S.

Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2005 Oct;50(5):505-16. Epub 2005 Sep 28. French.

PMID:
16198469
6.
7.
8.

Breast augmentation with round, smooth saline or gel implants: the pros and cons.

Elliott LF.

Clin Plast Surg. 2001 Jul;28(3):523-9.

PMID:
11471958
9.

Allergan's silicone gel breast implants.

Spear SL, Hedén P.

Expert Rev Med Devices. 2007 Sep;4(5):699-708. Review.

PMID:
17850205
10.
11.

Patient-reported satisfaction and health-related quality of life following breast reconstruction: a comparison of shaped cohesive gel and round cohesive gel implant recipients.

Macadam SA, Ho AL, Lennox PA, Pusic AL.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Mar;131(3):431-41. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31827c6d55.

PMID:
23142936
12.

Changes over time in mammary compliance values after breast augmentation.

Mazzocchi M, Alfano C, Fioramonti P, Scuderi N.

Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2006 Mar-Apr;30(2):198-205.

PMID:
16528621
13.

Silicone gel implants in breast augmentation and reconstruction.

Gampper TJ, Khoury H, Gottlieb W, Morgan RF.

Ann Plast Surg. 2007 Nov;59(5):581-90. Review.

PMID:
17992156
14.

Indications for extra full projection anatomical cohesive silicone gel implants in cosmetic and reconstructive breast surgery.

Mario AI, Molina AR, Malata CM.

Ann Plast Surg. 2008 Dec;61(6):607-12. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e318174333e.

PMID:
19034073
15.

Aesthetic breast augmentation: the double implant.

Bosch G, Jacobo O.

Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2001 Sep-Oct;25(5):353-6.

PMID:
11692250
16.

Soft cohesive silicone gel breast prostheses: a comparative prospective study of aesthetic results versus lower cohesivity silicone gel prostheses.

Panettiere P, Marchetti L, Accorsi D.

J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2007;60(5):482-9. Epub 2006 Sep 6.

PMID:
17399656
17.

Management of tuberous breast deformity with anatomic cohesive silicone gel breast implants.

Panchapakesan V, Brown MH.

Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2009 Jan;33(1):49-53. doi: 10.1007/s00266-008-9234-7. Epub 2008 Aug 28.

PMID:
18752021
18.
19.

Primary breast augmentation today: a survey of current breast augmentation practice patterns.

Reece EM, Ghavami A, Hoxworth RE, Alvarez SA, Hatef DA, Brown S, Rohrich RJ.

Aesthet Surg J. 2009 Mar-Apr;29(2):116-21. doi: 10.1016/j.asj.2008.12.006.

PMID:
19371842
20.

Breast augmentation with anatomic implants: a method based on the breast implantation base.

Martin del Yerro JL, Vegas MR, Sanz I, Moreno E, Fernandez V, Puga S, Vecino MG, Biggs TM.

Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2014 Apr;38(2):329-37. doi: 10.1007/s00266-013-0190-5. Epub 2013 Sep 4.

PMID:
24002490
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk