Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 358

1.

Modelling publication bias in meta-analysis: a review.

Sutton AJ, Song F, Gilbody SM, Abrams KR.

Stat Methods Med Res. 2000 Oct;9(5):421-45. Review.

PMID:
11191259
2.

Publication bias in medical informatics evaluation research: is it an issue or not?

Machan C, Ammenwerth E, Bodner T.

Stud Health Technol Inform. 2006;124:957-62.

PMID:
17108634
3.

[Practical considerations on detection of publication bias].

Palma Pérez S, Delgado Rodríguez M.

Gac Sanit. 2006 Dec;20 Suppl 3:10-6. Spanish.

4.

Systematic reviews and meta-analysis: a structured review of the methodological literature.

Sutton AJ, Jones DR, Abrams KR, Sheldon TA, Song F.

J Health Serv Res Policy. 1999 Jan;4(1):49-55. Review.

PMID:
10345567
5.

Assessing publication bias in meta-analysis.

Soeken KL, Sripusanapan A.

Nurs Res. 2003 Jan-Feb;52(1):57-60.

PMID:
12552177
6.
7.

The implications of publication bias for meta-analysis' other parameter.

Jackson D.

Stat Med. 2006 Sep 15;25(17):2911-21.

PMID:
16345059
8.

Is there bias in the publication of individual patient data meta-analyses?

Tierney JF, Clarke M, Stewart LA.

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2000 Spring;16(2):657-67.

PMID:
10932430
9.

Meta-analysis and sensitivity analysis for multi-arm trials with selection bias.

Chootrakool H, Shi JQ, Yue R.

Stat Med. 2011 May 20;30(11):1183-98. doi: 10.1002/sim.4143. Epub 2011 Jan 16.

PMID:
21538449
10.

Empirical evaluation showed that the Copas selection model provided a useful summary in 80% of meta-analyses.

Carpenter JR, Schwarzer G, Rücker G, Künstler R.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Jun;62(6):624-631.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.12.002. Epub 2009 Mar 12.

PMID:
19282148
11.

Estimating the proportion of studies missing for meta-analysis due to publication bias.

Formann AK.

Contemp Clin Trials. 2008 Sep;29(5):732-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2008.05.004. Epub 2008 May 19.

PMID:
18586577
12.

Arcsine test for publication bias in meta-analyses with binary outcomes.

Rücker G, Schwarzer G, Carpenter J.

Stat Med. 2008 Feb 28;27(5):746-63.

PMID:
17592831
13.

Publication and related bias in meta-analysis: power of statistical tests and prevalence in the literature.

Sterne JA, Gavaghan D, Egger M.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2000 Nov;53(11):1119-29.

PMID:
11106885
14.
15.

Identification and impact of outcome selection bias in meta-analysis.

Williamson PR, Gamble C.

Stat Med. 2005 May 30;24(10):1547-61. Review.

PMID:
15580591
16.

Publication bias was not a good reason to discourage trials with low power.

Borm GF, den Heijer M, Zielhuis GA.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Jan;62(1):47.e1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.02.017. Epub 2008 Jul 14.

PMID:
18620841
17.
18.

Performance of the trim and fill method in the presence of publication bias and between-study heterogeneity.

Peters JL, Sutton AJ, Jones DR, Abrams KR, Rushton L.

Stat Med. 2007 Nov 10;26(25):4544-62.

PMID:
17476644
19.

Publication bias in psychological science: prevalence, methods for identifying and controlling, and implications for the use of meta-analyses.

Ferguson CJ, Brannick MT.

Psychol Methods. 2012 Mar;17(1):120-8. doi: 10.1037/a0024445. Epub 2011 Jul 25.

PMID:
21787082
20.

Asymmetric funnel plots and publication bias in meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy.

Song F, Khan KS, Dinnes J, Sutton AJ.

Int J Epidemiol. 2002 Feb;31(1):88-95.

Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk