Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 93

1.

Effectiveness of a journal intervention to improve abstract quality.

Pitkin RM, Branagan MA, Burmeister LF.

JAMA. 2000 Jan 26;283(4):481. No abstract available.

PMID:
10659873
2.

The need for concrete improvement in abstract quality.

Winker MA.

JAMA. 1999 Mar 24-31;281(12):1129-30. No abstract available.

PMID:
10188667
4.

Making an impact: the rise of the impact factor as a measure of journal quality.

Leff D.

J Am Diet Assoc. 2005 Jan;105(1):29-30. No abstract available.

PMID:
15635340
5.

Writing the abstract: completeness and accuracy matter.

von Elm E.

Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2011 Jul;28(7):483-4. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e328343b160. No abstract available.

PMID:
21659806
6.

A focused approach to coding quality control.

Green DK.

Top Health Rec Manage. 1986 Sep;7(1):1-10. No abstract available.

PMID:
10311648
7.

The quality of reporting of trial abstracts is suboptimal: survey of major general medical journals.

Berwanger O, Ribeiro RA, Finkelsztejn A, Watanabe M, Suzumura EA, Duncan BB, Devereaux PJ, Cook D.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Apr;62(4):387-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.05.013. Epub 2008 Nov 17. Review.

PMID:
19010643
8.

[How to write an abstract for a scientific publication or communication].

Velasco Rodríguez MJ, Rodríguez Del Aguila MM, Sordo Del Castillo L, Pérez Vicente S.

Med Clin (Barc). 2008 Nov 8;131(16):614-6. Review. Spanish. No abstract available.

PMID:
19080853
9.

Quality of abstracts in 3 clinical dermatology journals.

Dupuy A, Khosrotehrani K, Lebbé C, Rybojad M, Morel P.

Arch Dermatol. 2003 May;139(5):589-93.

PMID:
12756095
10.

Has the quality of abstracts for randomised controlled trials improved since the release of Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trial guideline for abstract reporting? A survey of four high-profile anaesthesia journals.

Can OS, Yilmaz AA, Hasdogan M, Alkaya F, Turhan SC, Can MF, Alanoglu Z.

Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2011 Jul;28(7):485-92. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32833fb96f.

PMID:
21037480
11.

Could you defend the accuracy of your discharge abstract data?

Kloss LL, Woodbury M.

Top Health Rec Manage. 1982 Jun;2(4):33-40. No abstract available.

PMID:
10255781
12.

Ongoing coding reviews: ways to ensure quality.

Thompson NS, Koch D.

J AHIMA. 1999 Jan;70(1):45-9.

PMID:
10339004
13.

Structured abstracts: do they improve the quality of information in abstracts?

Sharma S, Harrison JE.

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Oct;130(4):523-30.

PMID:
17045153
14.

Important issues to emerge from recoding studies.

Cook A.

Health Inf Manag. 1997 Dec-1998 Feb;27(4):176-7. No abstract available.

PMID:
10178425
15.
16.

Data quality--monitoring the accuracy of clinical information.

Chisholm K, Chu YC, Szeto K, Fung H.

Health Inf Manag. 1994 Dec;24(4):135-6. No abstract available.

PMID:
10142474
17.

Quality of abstract reporting: caveat medicus.

Doig GS.

Crit Care Med. 2005 Sep;33(9):2122-3. No abstract available.

PMID:
16148493
18.

Medicare data study spotlights coding errors.

Cottrell C.

J AHIMA. 2000 Sep;71(8):58-9. No abstract available.

PMID:
11186626
19.

Quality considerations in medical records abstracting systems.

Gardiner RC.

J Med Syst. 1978;2(1):31-43.

PMID:
10238824
20.

Medical indexing outside the National Library of Medicine.

McGregor B.

J Med Libr Assoc. 2002 Jul;90(3):339-41. No abstract available.

Items per page

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk