Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 194

1.

Efficacy of cervical-smear collection devices: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Martin-Hirsch P, Lilford R, Jarvis G, Kitchener HC.

Lancet. 1999 Nov 20;354(9192):1763-70. Erratum in: Lancet 2000 Jan 29;355(9201):414.

PMID:
10577637
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
2.

Collection devices for obtaining cervical cytology samples.

Martin-Hirsch P, Jarvis G, Kitchener H, Lilford R.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(3):CD001036. Review.

PMID:
10908482
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
3.

Collection devices for obtaining cervical cytology samples.

Martin-Hirsch P, Jarvis G, Kitchener H, Lilford R.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(2):CD001036. Review. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(3):CD001036.

PMID:
10796736
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
4.

Effect of the size of extended, modified Ayre's spatula on endocervical cell yield in the postmenopausal women.

Parnpoonsarp W, Ploarsa P, Arpakorn V.

J Med Assoc Thai. 2009 Jun;92 Suppl 3:S9-14.

PMID:
19702064
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
5.

The cytological detection of persistent cervical intraepithelial neoplasia after local ablative treatment: a comparison of sampling devices.

Hughes RG, Haddad NG, Smart GE, Colquhoun M, McGoogan E, MacIntyre CC, Prescott RJ.

Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1992 Jun;99(6):498-502.

PMID:
1637767
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
6.

Improving the quality of cervical screening.

George S, Abrahams Y, Karim SZ, Kothari A.

BJOG. 2004 Sep;111(9):960-6.

PMID:
15327611
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
7.

The effect of different sampling devices on the presence of endocervical cells in cervical smears. A systematic literature review.

Buntinx F, Knottnerus JA, André J, Crebolder HF, Essed GG.

Eur J Cancer Prev. 1994 Jan;3(1):23-30.

PMID:
8130713
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
8.

Vaginal vault smears after hysterectomy for reasons other than malignancy: a systematic review of the literature.

Stokes-Lampard H, Wilson S, Waddell C, Ryan A, Holder R, Kehoe S.

BJOG. 2006 Dec;113(12):1354-65. Review.

PMID:
17081187
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
9.

Order of endocervical and ectocervical cytologic sampling and the quality of the Papanicolaou smear.

Eisenberger D, Hernandez E, Tener T, Atkinson BF.

Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Nov;90(5):755-8.

PMID:
9351759
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
10.

Improved yield of endocervical cells on Papanicolaou smears in a residency setting.

Kivlahan C, Ingram E.

J Fam Pract. 1985 Apr;20(4):381-5.

PMID:
3981098
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
11.
12.

Papanicolaou smear adequacy: the cervical cytobrush and Ayre spatula compared with the extended-tip spatula.

Noel ML.

J Am Board Fam Pract. 1989 Jul-Sep;2(3):156-60.

PMID:
2665423
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
13.

Split-sample analysis of discarded cells from liquid-based Pap smear sampling devices.

Rinas AC, Mittman BW Jr, Le LV, Hartmann K, Cayless J, Singh HK.

Acta Cytol. 2006 Jan-Feb;50(1):55-62.

PMID:
16514841
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
14.

Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis cervical infection: a comparison of Papanicolaou and immunofluorescent staining in smears obtained by Ayre's spatula and cytobrush.

Maeda MY, Longatto Filho A, Santos DR, Cavaliere MJ, Shih LW, Oyafuso MS, De Andrea Filho A.

Pathologica. 1991 Jan-Feb;83(1083):105-9.

PMID:
1714070
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
15.

Effect of the sampling sequence on the quality of Papanicolaou smear.

Rahnama P, Faghihzadeh S, Ziaei S.

Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2005 Jan-Feb;15(1):66-9.

PMID:
15670299
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
16.

A comparative study of two devices used for cervical cell sampling raises some doubts about liquid-based cytology.

Kothari A, Karim SZ, Gordon A, Raslan F, Abdalla M, George S.

Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2006 Jul-Aug;16(4):1579-86.

PMID:
16884369
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
17.

Use of a cervical brush for Papanicolaou smear collection. A meta-analysis.

Bauman BJ.

J Nurse Midwifery. 1993 Sep-Oct;38(5):267-75.

PMID:
8246082
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
18.

A randomized comparison of the 3 Papanicolaou smear collection methods.

Kavak ZN, Eren F, Pekin S, Küllü S.

Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1995 Nov;35(4):446-9.

PMID:
8717577
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
19.

Comparison of spatula and nonspatula methods for cervical sampling.

Rammou-Kinia R, Anagnostopoulou I, Gomousa M.

Acta Cytol. 1991 Jan-Feb;35(1):69-75.

PMID:
1994638
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
20.

Optimal collection technique and devices for a quality pap smear.

Marchand L, Mundt M, Klein G, Agarwal SC.

WMJ. 2005 Aug;104(6):51-5.

PMID:
16218317
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk