Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Links from Books

Items: 1 to 20 of 64

1.

Enhanced reactivity to visual stimuli in deaf individuals.

Bottari D, Nava E, Ley P, Pavani F.

Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2010;28(2):167-79. doi: 10.3233/RNN-2010-0502.

PMID:
20404406
2.

Visual skills and cross-modal plasticity in deaf readers: possible implications for acquiring meaning from print.

Dye MW, Hauser PC, Bavelier D.

Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008 Dec;1145:71-82. doi: 10.1196/annals.1416.013. Review.

3.

Voluntary and involuntary attention have different consequences: the effect of perceptual difficulty.

Prinzmetal W, Zvinyatskovskiy A, Gutierrez P, Dilem L.

Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2009 Feb;62(2):352-69. doi: 10.1080/17470210801954892. Epub 2008 Apr 18.

PMID:
18609402
4.

Change blindness in profoundly deaf individuals and cochlear implant recipients.

Bottari D, Turatto M, Bonfioli F, Abbadessa C, Selmi S, Beltrame MA, Pavani F.

Brain Res. 2008 Nov 25;1242:209-18. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.05.041. Epub 2008 May 26.

PMID:
18597741
5.

Visual temporal order judgment in profoundly deaf individuals.

Nava E, Bottari D, Zampini M, Pavani F.

Exp Brain Res. 2008 Sep;190(2):179-88. doi: 10.1007/s00221-008-1459-9. Epub 2008 Jun 18.

PMID:
18563399
6.

Enhanced visual speech perception in individuals with early-onset hearing impairment.

Auer ET Jr, Bernstein LE.

J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2007 Oct;50(5):1157-65.

PMID:
17905902
7.

How vision matters for individuals with hearing loss.

Mitchell TV, Maslin MT.

Int J Audiol. 2007 Sep;46(9):500-11. Review.

PMID:
17828666
8.

Microsaccades distinguish between global and local visual processing.

Turatto M, Valsecchi M, Tamè L, Betta E.

Neuroreport. 2007 Jul 2;18(10):1015-8.

PMID:
17558287
9.

Deafness and visual enumeration: not all aspects of attention are modified by deafness.

Hauser PC, Dye MW, Boutla M, Green CS, Bavelier D.

Brain Res. 2007 Jun 11;1153:178-87. Epub 2007 Mar 28.

10.

Which aspects of visual attention are changed by deafness? The case of the Attentional Network Test.

Dye MW, Baril DE, Bavelier D.

Neuropsychologia. 2007 Apr 9;45(8):1801-11. Epub 2007 Jan 10.

11.

Do deaf individuals see better?

Bavelier D, Dye MW, Hauser PC.

Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 Nov;10(11):512-8. Epub 2006 Oct 2. Review.

12.
13.
14.

Visual attention in deaf and normal hearing adults: effects of stimulus compatibility.

Sladen DP, Tharpe AM, Ashmead DH, Wesley Grantham D, Chun MM.

J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2005 Dec;48(6):1529-37.

PMID:
16478388
15.

Comparing the effects of auditory deprivation and sign language within the auditory and visual cortex.

Fine I, Finney EM, Boynton GM, Dobkins KR.

J Cogn Neurosci. 2005 Oct;17(10):1621-37.

PMID:
16269101
16.

Change perception using visual transients: object substitution and deletion.

Turatto M, Bridgeman B.

Exp Brain Res. 2005 Dec;167(4):595-608. Epub 2005 Jul 26.

PMID:
16044302
17.

Sensory temporal processing in adults with early hearing loss.

Heming JE, Brown LN.

Brain Cogn. 2005 Nov;59(2):173-82. Epub 2005 Jul 25.

PMID:
16043276
18.

Speechreading skill and visual movement sensitivity are related in deaf speechreaders.

Mohammed T, Campbell R, MacSweeney M, Milne E, Hansen P, Coleman M.

Perception. 2005;34(2):205-16.

PMID:
15832570
19.

Attention: reaction time and accuracy reveal different mechanisms.

Prinzmetal W, McCool C, Park S.

J Exp Psychol Gen. 2005 Feb;134(1):73-92.

PMID:
15702964
20.

Neural networks underlying endogenous and exogenous visual-spatial orienting.

Mayer AR, Dorflinger JM, Rao SM, Seidenberg M.

Neuroimage. 2004 Oct;23(2):534-41.

PMID:
15488402
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk