Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
  • The following term was not found in PubMed: 2007;146.
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Ann Intern Med. 2007 May 15;146(10):735-41.

Systematic review: repair of unruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Author information

  • 1Veterans Affairs Medical Center and University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55417, USA.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Recent recommendations to screen for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in high-risk populations and the rapidly increasing use of endovascular repair have led to increased interest in evaluating the effectiveness of treatment options for patients with AAA.

PURPOSE:

To compare the effectiveness of treatment options, including active surveillance, open repair, and endovascular repair, for unruptured AAAs.

DATA SOURCES:

The authors searched MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, and www.ClinicalTrials.gov through December 2006 with no language restrictions, searched reference lists, and queried experts and study authors.

STUDY SELECTION:

Randomized trials that compared open or endovascular AAA repair with another treatment strategy and published clinical outcomes.

DATA EXTRACTION:

Data were extracted onto standardized, piloted forms and were confirmed.

DATA SYNTHESIS:

Two trials compared open repair with surveillance for small AAAs (n = 2226). Repair did not improve all-cause mortality (relative risk, 1.01 [95% CI, 0.77 to 1.32]) or AAA-related mortality (relative risk, 0.78 [CI, 0.56 to 1.10]). Four trials compared open repair with endovascular repair (n = 1532). Endovascular repair reduced 30-day mortality (relative risk, 0.33 [CI, 0.17 to 0.64]) but not mid-term (up to 4 years) mortality (relative risk, 0.95 [CI, 0.76 to 1.19]). One trial compared endovascular repair with observation in 338 patients who were unfit for open repair. Endovascular repair did not reduce all-cause mortality or AAA-related mortality, but high crossover and procedural mortality rates complicate interpretation of results.

LIMITATIONS:

Few trials have been published. Those published were of small to moderate size and were not U.S. trials of endovascular repair.

CONCLUSIONS:

Repairing AAAs smaller than 5.5 cm has not been shown to improve survival. Endovascular repair is associated with lower operative mortality than open repair, similar mid-term mortality, and unknown long-term mortality and has not been shown to improve survival in patients unfit for open repair. Long-term trial data comparing endovascular repair with open repair are needed, as is another trial comparing endovascular repair with observation in high-risk patients.

Comment in

PMID:
17502634
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Silverchair Information Systems Icon for PubMed Health
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk