Background: It is necessary to develop a new thrombolytic agent which can be used by a single bolus at first aid sites to decrease the time to reperfusion in clinical practice. HTUPA, a genetically engineered new thrombolytic with a longer half-life, is well qualified. We aim to compare the thrombolytic efficacy and safety of human tissue urokinase type plasminogen activator (HTUPA) to recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) in Chinese patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI).
Methods: AMI patients (n=221) were randomized to rt-PA (a standard protocol) or HTUPA (25 mg bolus) treatment groups. All patients also received oral aspirin and intravenous heparin. Coronary angiography was performed 90 min after therapy initiation to determine infarct-related coronary artery (IRA) patency. Clinical outcomes and changes of clotting variables, heart rate, blood pressure, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and electrocardiogram were evaluated.
Results: Patent IRA [thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) grade 2 or 3] was observed in 77% of HTUPA-treated patients, compared to 76% of rt-PA-treated patients (P=0.76). TIMI grade 3 patency rates were 52% and 44% in the HTUPA and rt-PA groups, respectively (P=0.37). The total patency rate was 77% (86/111 patients) in the HTUPA group and 73% (80/110 patients) in the rt-PA group (P=0.41). Adverse events were infrequent in both groups, and no significant differences were detected in mortality, re-occlusion rate, revascularization rate, adverse effects, clotting index, LVEF, or electrocardiogram between the two groups.
Conclusions: Intravenous HTUPA had a safe and efficacious profile as good as rt-PA in patients with AMI.
Keywords: Acute myocardial infarction; HTUPA; Patency; Thrombolysis; rt-PA.
Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.