Effects of intramuscularly administered enrofloxacin on the susceptibility of commensal intestinal Escherichia coli in pigs (sus scrofa domestica)

BMC Vet Res. 2017 Dec 4;13(1):378. doi: 10.1186/s12917-017-1260-8.

Abstract

Background: In the European Union, various fluoroquinolones are authorised for the treatment of food producing animals. Each administration poses an increased risk of development and spread of antimicrobial resistance. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of parenteral administration of enrofloxacin on the prevalence of enrofloxacin and ciprofloxacin susceptibilities in the commensal intestinal E. coli population.

Methods: E. coli isolates from faeces of twelve healthy pigs were included. Six pigs were administered enrofloxacin on day 1 to 3 and after two weeks for further three days. The other pigs formed the control group. MIC values were determined. Virulence and resistance genes were detected by PCR. Phylogenetic grouping was performed by PCR. Enrofloxacin and ciprofloxacin were analysed in sedimentation samples by HPLC.

Results: Susceptibility shifts in commensal E. coli isolates were determined in both groups. Non-wildtype E. coli could be cultivated from two animals of the experimental group for the first time one week after the first administration and from one animal of the control group on day 28. The environmental load with enrofloxacin in sedimentation samples showed the highest amount between days one and five. The repeated parenteral administration of enrofloxacin to pigs resulted in rapidly increased MIC values (day 28: MIC up to 4 mg/L, day 35: MIC ≥ 32mg/L). E. coli populations of the control group in the same stable without direct contact to the experimental group were affected.

Conclusion: The parenteral administration of enrofloxacin to piglets considerably reduced the number of the susceptible intestinal E. coli population which was replaced by E. coli strains with increased MIC values against enrofloxacin. Subsequently also pigs of the control were affected suggesting a transferability of strains from the experimental group through the environment to the control group especially as we could isolate the same PFGE strains from both pig groups and the environment.

Keywords: E. coli; Enrofloxacin; Macrorestriction; PFGE; Parenteral administration; Resistance.

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents / administration & dosage
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents / therapeutic use*
  • Ciprofloxacin / administration & dosage
  • Ciprofloxacin / therapeutic use
  • Disease Susceptibility / veterinary
  • Enrofloxacin
  • Escherichia coli Infections / microbiology
  • Escherichia coli Infections / prevention & control
  • Escherichia coli Infections / veterinary*
  • Feces / microbiology
  • Fluoroquinolones / administration & dosage
  • Fluoroquinolones / therapeutic use*
  • Injections, Intramuscular / veterinary
  • Microbial Sensitivity Tests / veterinary
  • Swine
  • Swine Diseases / microbiology
  • Swine Diseases / prevention & control*

Substances

  • Anti-Bacterial Agents
  • Fluoroquinolones
  • Enrofloxacin
  • Ciprofloxacin