Ten Good Reasons for the Use of the Tellurium-Centered Anderson-Evans Polyoxotungstate in Protein Crystallography

Acc Chem Res. 2017 Jun 20;50(6):1441-1448. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.7b00109. Epub 2017 May 31.

Abstract

Protein crystallography represents at present the most productive and most widely used method to obtain structural information on target proteins and protein-ligand complexes within the atomic resolution range. The knowledge obtained in this way is essential for understanding the biology, chemistry, and biochemistry of proteins and their functions but also for the development of compounds of high pharmacological and medicinal interest. Here, we address the very central problem in protein crystallography: the unpredictability of the crystallization process. Obtaining protein crystals that diffract to high resolutions represents the essential step to perform any structural study by X-ray crystallography; however, this method still depends basically on trial and error making it a very time- and resource-consuming process. The use of additives is an established process to enable or improve the crystallization of proteins in order to obtain high quality crystals. Therefore, a more universal additive addressing a wider range of proteins is desirable as it would represent a huge advance in protein crystallography and at the same time drastically impact multiple research fields. This in turn could add an overall benefit for the entire society as it profits from the faster development of novel or improved drugs and from a deeper understanding of biological, biochemical, and pharmacological phenomena. With this aim in view, we have tested several compounds belonging to the emerging class of polyoxometalates (POMs) for their suitability as crystallization additives and revealed that the tellurium-centered Anderson-Evans polyoxotungstate [TeW6O24]6- (TEW) was the most suitable POM-archetype. After its first successful application as a crystallization additive, we repeatedly reported on TEW's positive effects on the crystallization behavior of proteins with a particular focus on the protein-TEW interactions. As electrostatic interactions are the main force for TEW binding to proteins, TEW with its highly negative charge addresses in principle all proteins possessing positively charged patches. Furthermore, due to its high structural and chemical diversity, TEW exhibits major advantages over some commonly used crystallization additives. Therefore, we summarized all features of TEW, which are beneficial for protein crystallization, and present ten good reasons to promote the use of TEW in protein crystallography as a powerful additive. Our results demonstrate that TEW is a compound that is, in many respects, predestined as a crystallization additive. We assume that many crystallographers and especially researchers, who are not experts in this field but willing to crystallize their structurally unknown target protein, could benefit from the use of TEW as it is able to promote both the crystallization process itself and the subsequent structure elucidation by providing valuable anomalous signals, which are helpful for the phasing step.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Crystallization
  • Hydrogen-Ion Concentration
  • Proteins / chemistry*
  • Static Electricity
  • Tellurium / chemistry*
  • Tungsten Compounds / chemistry*

Substances

  • Proteins
  • Tungsten Compounds
  • polyoxometalate I
  • Tellurium