Evaluation of nasogastric tubes to enable differentiation between upper and lower gastrointestinal bleeding in unselected patients with melena

Eur J Emerg Med. 2016 Feb;23(1):71-3. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000263.

Abstract

Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding is a common surgical problem. The aim of this study was to evaluate how insertion of the nasogastric tube may enable differentiation between upper and lower GI bleeding in patients with melena. A retrospective study involving patients admitted to our surgery division with a melena was carried out between the years 2010 and 2012. A total of 386 patients were included in the study. Of these, 279 (72.2%) patients had negative nasogastric aspirate. The sensitivity of examination of nasogastric aspirate to establish the upper GI as the source of bleeding was only 28% and the negative predictive value of a negative nasogastric aspirate was less than 1%. Most patients who initially presented with melena and were found to have upper GI bleeding had a negative nasogastric aspirate. Insertion of a nasogastric tube does not affect the clinical decision to perform upper endoscopy and should not be routinely carried out.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Evaluation Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Cohort Studies
  • Diagnosis, Differential
  • Emergency Service, Hospital
  • Female
  • Gastrointestinal Contents*
  • Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage / diagnosis*
  • Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage / epidemiology
  • Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage / surgery
  • Hospitalization / statistics & numerical data
  • Humans
  • Intubation, Gastrointestinal / methods*
  • Male
  • Melena / diagnosis*
  • Melena / etiology
  • Middle Aged
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Risk Assessment
  • Severity of Illness Index