Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 1 to 20 of 53

PubMed Links for Books (Select 1938686)

1.

American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer, 2004.

Smith RA, Cokkinides V, Eyre HJ; American Cancer Society.

CA Cancer J Clin. 2004 Jan-Feb;54(1):41-52. Review.

PMID:
14974763
2.

Clinical validity of new ultrasound methods in the differential diagnosis of breast diseases.

Szebeni A, Rahóty P, Besznyák I.

Breast. 2002 Dec;11(6):489-95.

PMID:
14965715
3.

Accuracy of combined breast imaging in young women.

Houssami N, Irwig L, Loy C.

Breast. 2002 Feb;11(1):36-40.

PMID:
14965643
4.

Changes in breast cancer detection and mammography recall rates after the introduction of a computer-aided detection system.

Gur D, Sumkin JH, Rockette HE, Ganott M, Hakim C, Hardesty L, Poller WR, Shah R, Wallace L.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 Feb 4;96(3):185-90.

5.

The NASA Smart Probe Project for real-time multiple microsensor tissue recognition.

Andrews RJ, Mah RW.

Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2003;80(1-4):114-9.

PMID:
14745219
6.

The current status of digital mammography.

James JJ.

Clin Radiol. 2004 Jan;59(1):1-10. Review.

PMID:
14697370
7.

Fine needle aspiration biopsy of soft tissue sarcomas: utility and diagnostic challenges.

Singh HK, Kilpatrick SE, Silverman JF.

Adv Anat Pathol. 2004 Jan;11(1):24-37. Review.

PMID:
14676638
8.

Analytic modeling of breast elastography.

Liu HT, Sun LZ, Wang G, Vannier MW.

Med Phys. 2003 Sep;30(9):2340-9.

PMID:
14528956
9.

Evaluation of abnormal mammography results and palpable breast abnormalities.

Kerlikowske K, Smith-Bindman R, Ljung BM, Grady D.

Ann Intern Med. 2003 Aug 19;139(4):274-84. Review.

PMID:
12965983
10.

Comparisons of three alternative breast modalities in a common phantom imaging experiment.

Li D, Meaney PM, Tosteson TD, Jiang S, Kerner TE, McBride TO, Pogue BW, Hartov A, Paulsen KD.

Med Phys. 2003 Aug;30(8):2194-205.

PMID:
12945985
11.

Breast cancer diagnosis by scintimammography: a meta-analysis and review of the literature.

Liberman M, Sampalis F, Mulder DS, Sampalis JS.

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2003 Jul;80(1):115-26. Review.

PMID:
12889605
12.
13.

Tomographic mammography using a limited number of low-dose cone-beam projection images.

Wu T, Stewart A, Stanton M, McCauley T, Phillips W, Kopans DB, Moore RH, Eberhard JW, Opsahl-Ong B, Niklason L, Williams MB.

Med Phys. 2003 Mar;30(3):365-80.

PMID:
12674237
14.

Breast MR imaging.

Schnall MD.

Radiol Clin North Am. 2003 Jan;41(1):43-50. Review.

PMID:
12630684
15.

Initial in vivo experience with steady-state subzone-based MR elastography of the human breast.

Van Houten EE, Doyley MM, Kennedy FE, Weaver JB, Paulsen KD.

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2003 Jan;17(1):72-85.

PMID:
12500276
16.
17.

Positive predictive value of 99mTc sestamibi scintimammography in patients with non-palpable, mammographically detected, suspicious, breast lesions.

Lumachi F, Zucchetta P, Marzola MC, Ferretti G, Povolato M, Paris MK, Brandes AA, Bui F.

Nucl Med Commun. 2002 Nov;23(11):1073-8.

PMID:
12411835
18.

Diffraction enhanced imaging contrast mechanisms in breast cancer specimens.

Hasnah MO, Zhong Z, Oltulu O, Pisano E, Johnston RE, Sayers D, Thomlinson W, Chapman D.

Med Phys. 2002 Oct;29(10):2216-21.

PMID:
12408294
Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk