Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
Oncol Nurs Forum. 1998 Oct;25(9):1561-9.

Screening for prostate cancer in asymptomatic men: clinical, legal, and ethical implications.

Author information

  • 1College of Law, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, USA.

Abstract

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES:

To describe the opposing recommendations of the major medical organizations related to screening for prostate cancer and to explore the impact of these opposing recommendations on advanced practice nurses (APNs) who are in a position to decide who gets screened and when.

DATA SOURCES:

Published medical, legal, and economic articles, published legal verdicts and settlements, case law, and news reports.

DATA SYNTHESIS:

The national recommendations for screening for prostate cancer are conflicting and have legal, economic, and ethical implications for healthcare practitioners. Both the current early diagnostic tests, age- and race-based prostate specific antigen ranges, and the resultant treatment have significant problems and further contribute to the national controversy about whether to screen asymptomatic men. Lack of coverage for early detection of prostate cancer by many managed-care plans and Medicare also contribute to the dilemma practitioners face. However, electing not to screen "at-risk" men may subject APNs to charges of negligence or other legal theories.

CONCLUSIONS:

Present recommendations by the leading national medical, cancer, and policy organizations related to prostate cancer screening are contradictory. Adding to this national quagmire is the lack of financial support from Medicare and most health maintenance organization plans to pay for early detection of prostate cancer. These conflicting recommendations place APNs in a legally and ethically precarious position. APNs and nurses with patient education responsibilities should individualize decision-making and counsel their asymptomatic patients who may be at risk for prostate cancer about the benefits and complications of screening.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE:

Considering the multiple implications of the decision to screen for prostate cancer, counseling patients who may be at risk for the disease and involving them and their spouses may be the best approach in deciding whether to screen for prostate cancer in asymptomatic men.

PMID:
9802052
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk