Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Neuroimage. 1998 Aug;8(2):140-8.

Characterizing stimulus-response functions using nonlinear regressors in parametric fMRI experiments.

Author information

  • 1The Wellcome Department of Cognitive Neurology, Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom.

Abstract

Parametric study designs proved very useful in characterizing the relationship between experimental parameters (e.g., word presentation rate) and regional cerebral blood flow in positron emission tomography studies. In a previous paper we presented a method that fits nonlinear functions of stimulus or task parameters to hemodynamic responses, using second-order polynomial expansions. Here we expand this approach to model nonlinear relationships between BOLD responses and experimental parameters, using fMRI. We present a framework that allows this technique to be implemented in the context of the general linear model employed by statistical parametric mapping (SPM). Statistical inferences, in this instance, are based on F statistics and in this respect we emphasize the use of corrected P values for F fields (i.e., SPM¿F¿). The approach is illustrated with a fMRI study that looked at the effect of increasing auditory word-presentation rate. Our parametric design allowed us to characterize different forms of rate-dependent responses in three critical regions: (i) bilateral frontal regions showed a categorical response to the presence of words irrespective of rate, suggesting a role for this region in establishing cognitive (e.g., attentional) set; (ii) in bilateral occipitotemporal regions activations increased linearly with increasing word rate; and (iii) posterior auditory association cortex exhibited a nonlinear (inverted U) relationship to word rate.

Copyright 1998 Academic Press.

PMID:
9740757
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk