Citation rates and journal impact factors are not ...[Acta Orthop Scand. 1998] - PubMed Result

SearchDatabase nameforSearch term

Advanced Search

Your browser version may not work well with NCBI's Web applications. More information here...

Display Show

All: 1

Click to change filter selection through MyNCBI.

1: Acta Orthop Scand. 1998 Jun;69(3):224-9.Links

Comment in:: Acta Orthop Scand. 1998 Jun;69(3):221.

Citation rates and journal impact factors are not suitable for evaluation of research.

Institute for Studies in Research and Higher Education (NIFU), Oslo, Norway.

PMID: 9703393 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Related articles

The Journal of Sexual Medicine--impact factor predictions and analysis.
J Sex Med. 2007 Jul; 4(4 Pt 1):855-8.

[J Sex Med. 2007]
Review[The journal impact factor as a parameter for the evaluation of researchers and research]
Med Klin (Munich). 2003 Mar 15; 98(3):153-69.

[Med Klin (Munich). 2003]
ReviewBibliometrics, dermatology and contact dermatitis.
Contact Dermatitis. 2008 Sep; 59(3):133-6.

[Contact Dermatitis. 2008]
Better recognition of orthopedics, traumatology and sports medicine in the system of journal ranking.
Acta Orthop Scand. 1998 Jun; 69(3):222-3.

[Acta Orthop Scand. 1998]
Research misconduct policies of high impact biomedical journals.
Account Res. 2006 Jul-Sep; 13(3):247-58.

[Account Res. 2006]
» See reviews... | » See all...

Cited by 1 PubMed Central article

The journals of importance to UK clinicians: a questionnaire survey of surgeons.
Jones TH, Hanney S, Buxton MJ. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2006 Jun 8; 6:24. Epub 2006 Jun 8.

[BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2006]

Recent Activity

Clear Turn Off Turn On

Citation rates and journal impact factors are not suitable for evaluation of research.Citation rates and journal impact factors are not suitable for evaluation of research.

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

Display Show