Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Eye (Lond). 1998;12 ( Pt 2):278-81.

National survey of corneal abrasion treatment.

Author information

  • 1Royal Eye Infirmary, Plymouth, UK.

Abstract

PURPOSE:

To survey the different methods used in the management of corneal abrasions (including iatrongenic cases) nationally.

METHOD:

A questionnaire survey of all 162 ophthalmic units in the UK was carried out in 1997.

RESULTS:

The response rate was 134 of 162 (83%). The majority of units do not have an established policy for the treatment of corneal abrasions. Topical antibiotic alone and antibiotic together with a cycloplegic are the commonest immediate treatments, whilst the most common treatment course is topical antibiotic. Padding and patient follow-up is practised some of the time by most units and all of the time by the remaining minority. Use of a soft bandage contact lens is uncommon. There is no statistically significant difference (p > 0.05) between the policy-holders and non-policy-holders in their use of the various topical regimes, padding and soft bandage contact lens.

CONCLUSION:

The traditional trio of topical antibiotic, cycloplegic and padding is still the mainstay of corneal abrasion treatment amongst units nation-wide. However, there is a lack of reproducible scientific evidence to support this treatment. Larger randomised trials looking at the efficacy of the different treatment options are needed.

Comment in

PMID:
9683954
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Nature Publishing Group
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk