Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
    J Hypertens. 1998 Jun;16(6):771-8.

    The effect of home training with direct blood pressure biofeedback of hypertensives: a placebo-controlled study.

    Source

    Department of Cardiology and The Cooperative Research Centre for Cardiac Technology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

    Abstract

    BACKGROUND:

    Home training in self-lowering of blood pressure using continuous blood pressure feedback has not previously been reported. Enhancement of laboratory-learned skills was hypothesized on the basis of outcomes from other intellectual, emotional and physical endeavours.

    OBJECTIVE:

    To examine the supplementary effect of home blood pressure biofeedback training.

    DESIGN:

    Thirty unmedicated, mild hypertensives participated in a randomized, double-blinded, modified contingency placebo-controlled study.

    METHOD:

    After suitable screening and baseline blood pressure measurements subjects undertook eight laboratory biofeedback sessions and then 12 home training sessions over 4 weeks using continuous finger blood pressure monitoring.

    RESULTS:

    In the laboratory those being administered active therapy (n=16) lowered systolic pressures by 5 +/- 5.4 mmHg compared with a lowering of 4 +/- 4.2 mmHg with placebo (NS). During the fourth week at home lowering for the active group (11 +/- 8 mmHg) was greater than that with placebo (4 +/- 6.2 mmHg, P=0.017). Arm-cuff blood pressures were not statistically different for groups and with time but that of the active group was lower by 9 +/- 15.4/7 +/- 10.2 mmHg, which is a clinically relevant change, after home biofeedback.

    CONCLUSIONS:

    The efficacy of self-lowering of systolic blood pressure in mild hypertensives by continuous feedback was enhanced by 6 mmHg with 4 weeks of practice at home. Standard arm-cuff blood pressure was reduced by a clinically relevant amount. The home environment proved cost effective for this 'high-tech' approach.

    PMID:
    9663917
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

      Supplemental Content

      Icon for Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

      Save items

      Recent activity

      Your browsing activity is empty.

      Activity recording is turned off.

      Turn recording back on

      See more...
      Write to the Help Desk