The three-dimensional obturation of the root canal system is widely accepted as a key factor for successful endodontic therapy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the obturation of lateral canals and the main canal using cold lateral condensation versus the gutta-percha coated rigid carrier. Thirty epoxy blocks with five lateral canals placed at varying angles from the main canal were used. Each experimental group was obturated by a board certified endodontist with clinical experience in the respective obturation technique. The length of gutta-percha and sealer in the lateral canals was measured under a microscope (x30, Unitron) to the nearest 0.5 mm. The blocks were sectioned with an Isomet Plus precision saw (Buehler, Lake Bluff, IL) and copious water irrigation perpendicular to the main canal at the apex, the height of contour, and at 0.8, 1.6 and 2.4 mm from the canal apex. A microscope (x100, Leitz, Switzerland) was used to determine voids. There was significantly (p < .001) more gutta-percha in the lateral canals with the gutta-percha coated rigid carrier technique. In contrast, the cold lateral condensation technique had significantly (p < .001) more sealer in the lateral canals. However, there was no significant (p < .05) difference, in gutta-percha-plus-sealer filling of the lateral canals, between the two techniques. In the apical 1 mm of the main canal there were significantly (p < .011) fewer voids with the gutta-percha coated rigid carrier technique compared to the cold lateral condensation. In the model chosen, the gutta-percha coated rigid carrier technique and the cold lateral condensation technique were equally effective in filling lateral canals. In filling the main canal, however, the coated rigid carrier technique was more effective.