Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Am J Psychiatry. 1998 Mar;155(3):409-14.

Misuses and misunderstandings of boundary theory in clinical and regulatory settings.

Author information

  • 1Massachusetts Mental Health Center, Boston 02115, USA.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

This paper outlines a number of misapplications of boundary theory in both regulatory settings and clinical situations.

METHOD:

The authors review clinical vignettes that illustrate the difference between boundary crossings, which lead to productive work in psychotherapy, and boundary violations, which are harmful to the patient and exploit the patient's vulnerable position. They also discuss developments in the field that have led to an excessively rigid and defensive posture on the part of some clinicians that may lead to less than optimal psychiatric treatment. They survey recent developments in the wording of state statutes that broadly define sexual misconduct in psychotherapy.

RESULTS:

This review of the current status of boundary theory in both the law and clinical practice suggests that an overreaction has occurred that requires corrections.

CONCLUSIONS:

The critical role of context must be considered whenever a boundary problem has been alleged, and boundaries must be regarded as flexible standards of good practice rather than lists of generically forbidden behavior.

PMID:
9501754
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Silverchair Information Systems
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk