Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
    J Urol. 1998 Mar;159(3):864-7.

    Cost-effective hydrocele ablation.

    Source

    Division of Urology, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York, USA.

    Abstract

    PURPOSE:

    The surgical repair of hydroceles can be relatively expensive in some cases in terms of costs and initial limitation of activity. We ascertain whether aspiration and sclerotherapy of hydroceles is a safe, efficient, cost-effective treatment modality in select patients.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS:

    In 47 patients 51 hydroceles were treated in the office with aspiration and instillation of a sclerosing solution based on a sodium tetradecyl sulfate preparation. One treatment was done in 14 cases and 2 in the remainder. Medicare data for 1995 were used for charge analysis.

    RESULTS:

    The overall success rate was 61% (34 of 51 cases) with success defined as no perceptible ipsilateral scrotal fluid reaccumulation on palpation by a physician and complete patient satisfaction. The failure rate was 39% (17 cases) with failure defined as perceptible ipsilateral scrotal fluid reaccumulation on palpation by a physician and/or patient dissatisfaction. The charge differential of surgery versus aspiration and sclerotherapy was greater than 9:1.

    CONCLUSIONS:

    The aspiration and sclerotherapy technique that we used appears to be an efficacious, safe, cost-effective treatment modality in select patients with idiopathic hydroceles.

    PMID:
    9474170
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

      Supplemental Content

      Recent activity

      Your browsing activity is empty.

      Activity recording is turned off.

      Turn recording back on

      See more...
      Write to the Help Desk