Abstract

Over a 4-year period 24 patients out of 376 who required a rotator cuff repair were selected for arthroscopic-assisted rotator cuff repair. Preoperative selection criteria were refractory pain in the setting of good range of motion and strength (after an impingement test), absence of radiographic superior humeral head translation, and magnetic resonance imaging evidence of minimally retracted tear without rotator cuff muscle atrophy. Intraoperative selection criteria were the findings of an avulsion-type tear configuration with good tendon quality and absence of subscapularis tendon involvement. Based on these intraoperative criteria, 7 of the 24 patients were converted to an open approach to mobilize retracted and friable tendon tissue in a complex tear configuration. The remaining 17 patients underwent a transosseous arthroscopic-assisted rotator cuff repair with an average postoperative follow-up of 23 months. Evaluation by an independent therapist determined the postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Function Index of 96 +/- 3 for the operative shoulder. The Functional Rating Scores for Activities of Daily Living and Sports Activity Score were 89% +/- 10% and 87% +/- 12%, respectively. Instrumented isometric strength for abduction and external rotation strength in the operated shoulder were 94% +/- 20% and 93% +/- 20%, respectively, compared with the contralateral unoperated side. Five of eight patients who performed overhead sports returned to a premorbid level of performance, and 14 of 15 patients available for follow-up believed that their result was excellent. We conclude that through careful selection one can identify patients optimally suited for arthroscopic-assisted rotator cuff repair, but some may have to be converted to an open end approach because of the quality of the tendon tissue and configuration of the tear requiring soft tissue releases.