Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Scand J Prim Health Care. 1997 Sep;15(3):134-40.

Fifteen years with clinical guidelines in the treatment of hypertension--still discrepancies between intentions and practice.

Author information

  • 1National Institute of Public Health, Community Medicine Research Unit, Verdal, Norway.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

To assess physicians' current adherence to the Norwegian clinical guidelines for the treatment of hypertension.

DESIGN:

Descriptive, retrospective registration of information from patient records of one specified year. In addition, mailed questionnaire to examine the representativeness of the participating doctors.

SETTING:

General practice in Sør- and Nord-Trøndelag counties in Norway, 380,000 inhabitants.

PATIENTS:

In one year 2468 patients were registered with the diagnosis of hypertension in the records of 56 general practitioners. The patients were 57% women and 43% men; 41% were 70 years or older.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:

Levels of blood pressure in accordance with the recommendations of the Norwegian clinical guidelines for hypertension. Fractions of patients with a measured blood pressure and serum cholesterol in one year.

RESULTS:

At least one blood pressure was recorded in 95% of the hypertensive patients during the specified year. The systolic blood pressure was 140 mmHg or less in 25% and 160 mmHg or less in 65%, while the diastolic blood pressure was 90 mmHg or less in 61%. According to the Norwegian clinical guidelines for systolic blood pressure, 29% of the women and 21% of the men were above recommended levels for treatment. With respect to the diastolic blood pressure, the figures were 38% for women and 40% for men. Patients under 60 years of age were often not treated according to the recommendations. Serum cholesterol was not recorded during the specified year in 68% of the total group, nor in 55% of patients aged 65 years or younger.

CONCLUSION:

There are still major discrepancies between current practice and the intentions laid down in the Norwegian clinical guidelines. A discussion of alternative methods for implementation and for evaluation of the efficacy of clinical guidelines is needed.

PMID:
9323780
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk