Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Ann Pharmacother. 1997 Jun;31(6):782-5.

Depression in primary care: review of AHCPR guidelines.

Author information

  • 1College of Pharmacy, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City 73117, USA.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

To present an overview and evaluation of the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR) clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of depression.

INTRODUCTION:

One responsibility of the AHCPR is the development and periodic review and update of clinical practice guidelines. This process is undertaken by an independent panel composed of groups of clinicians and other experts from the private sector. Their findings are published in a four-volume, softcover set of booklets. DATA SOURCE AND EVALUATION: Volume 2 in the four-volume set includes a comprehensive complication, synthesis, and critical evaluation of the studies of different treatments for depression. Studies included for evaluation were randomized, prospective clinical trials that were pertinent to all topics concerning the treatment of depression. In some areas, the opinions of the panel were included due to a paucity of data from well-controlled clinical trials. Each AHCPR guideline was followed by a code that indicated whether the strength of evidence supporting that guideline was based on good or fair research-based evidence, or whether it was based primarily on panel members' opinions.

CONCLUSIONS:

With regard to drug treatment, the guidelines are good. However, since these guidelines were published in 1993 they might be considered somewhat dated because more antidepressants have become available in the interim. Overall, the AHCPR guidelines reflect an extensive review of the literature provided by the panel, as well as input from a highly respected group of reviewers. The panel included physicians, a nurse, a social worker, a psychologist, and a consumer representative. Unfortunately, a pharmacist was not included on the panel. Input from pharmacy practitioners would have been valuable.

PMID:
9184725
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk