Why the impact factor of journals should not be us...[BMJ. 1997] - PubMed Result

Search for

Advanced Search (beta)

Your browser version may not work well with NCBI's Web applications. More information here...

Display Show

All: 1

Review: 0

Click to change filter selection through MyNCBI.

1: BMJ. 1997 Feb 15;314(7079):498-502. Links

Comment in:: Med Hypotheses. 2005;65(4):822.

Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research.

Institute for Studies in Research and Higher Education, (NIFU), Oslo, Norway.

PMID: 9056804 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

PMCID: PMC2126010

Related Articles

[Factors of evaluation and interaction of scientific journals--impact factor and interjournal impact factor] [Wiad Lek. 2007]
Scope and geographical distribution of African medical journals active in 2005. [S Afr Med J. 2006]
Impact factor as a misleading tool in evaluation of medical journals. [Lancet. 1995]
[Impact factor or do we have to choose between the impact factor and the Revue de Chirurgie Orthopédique?] [Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2001]
The journal impact factor: too much of an impact? [Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2006]
» See all Related Articles...

Display Show